New Mexico State · away
at
Final NMSU 19 – 29 HAW
Saturday 2026-09-12 23:59 · Clarence T.C. Ching Athletics Complex
Hawai'i · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
HAW pass rush3.5% 11596th6.3% 255120thfaces NMSU3.3% 12236th3.4% ~1.1 sacks
NMSU pass rush4.2% 9586th9.4% 20356thfaces HAW5.1% 19469th4.7% ~1.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

NMSU with the ball

NMSU offence vs HAW defenceNMSU offenceHAW defencerank gap
points added per play0.12183rd0.213124th+41
success rate0.43873rd0.466126th+53
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.39717th1.22770th+53
rush: points added per play0.04894th0.250131st+37
rush: success rate0.45466th0.490131st+65
rush: explosiveness0.99059th1.031102nd+43
pass: points added per play0.28162nd0.13070th+8
pass: success rate0.44169th0.435103rd+34
pass: explosiveness1.78021st1.44747th+26
standard downs: success rate0.47391st0.526128th+37
passing downs: success rate0.36040th0.30695th+55
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.04582nd3.437134th+52
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16869th0.1103rd-66
short-yardage conversion rate0.684100th0.75083rd-17
points per trip inside the 403.76277th3.77398th+21
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.176117th0.13430th-87
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09281st0.07529th-52
havoc allowed by the secondary0.085131st0.06065th-66
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.6003rd——

HAW with the ball

HAW offence vs NMSU defenceHAW offenceNMSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.042112th0.158108th-4
success rate0.384117th0.42394th-23
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.125116th1.23071st-45
rush: points added per play-0.008116th0.150116th0
rush: success rate0.43385th0.42587th+2
rush: explosiveness0.86994th1.01495th+1
pass: points added per play0.117105th0.19986th-19
pass: success rate0.373114th0.42191st-23
pass: explosiveness1.274131st1.46951st-80
standard downs: success rate0.439120th0.47790th-30
passing downs: success rate0.29189th0.315100th+11
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13865th3.156109th+44
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17580th0.18756th-24
short-yardage conversion rate0.80038th0.889133rd+95
points per trip inside the 403.190113th4.346124th+11
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.168104th0.12114th-90
havoc allowed by the front seven0.108110th0.07935th-75
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06187th0.04222nd-65
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.70023rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.