New Mexico · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-17 · time TBA · Clarence T.C. Ching Athletics Complex
Hawai'i · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
HAW pass rush3.5% 11596th6.3% 255120thfaces UNM14.1% 71134th8.8% ~2.9 sacks
UNM pass rush5.8% 8651st13.3% 17310thfaces HAW5.1% 19469th5.5% ~1.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UNM with the ball

UNM offence vs HAW defenceUNM offenceHAW defencerank gap
points added per play0.16367th0.213124th+57
success rate0.41796th0.466126th+30
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.23566th1.22770th+4
rush: points added per play0.26419th0.250131st+112
rush: success rate0.46259th0.490131st+72
rush: explosiveness1.12618th1.031102nd+84
pass: points added per play-0.021129th0.13070th-59
pass: success rate0.337129th0.435103rd-26
pass: explosiveness1.54271st1.44747th-24
standard downs: success rate0.47390th0.526128th+38
passing downs: success rate0.28794th0.30695th+1
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.28544th3.437134th+90
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14038th0.1103rd-35
short-yardage conversion rate0.8898th0.75083rd+75
points per trip inside the 404.27352nd3.77398th+46
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11734th0.13430th-4
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08769th0.07529th-40
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03014th0.06065th+51
average starting field position (yards from own goal)59.600138th——

HAW with the ball

HAW offence vs UNM defenceHAW offenceUNM defencerank gap
points added per play0.042112th-0.1467th-105
success rate0.384117th0.32113th-104
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.125116th1.374116th0
rush: points added per play-0.008116th-0.14518th-98
rush: success rate0.43385th0.30713th-72
rush: explosiveness0.86994th0.92674th-20
pass: points added per play0.117105th0.08658th-47
pass: success rate0.373114th0.35128th-86
pass: explosiveness1.274131st1.828126th-5
standard downs: success rate0.439120th0.36812th-108
passing downs: success rate0.29189th0.24736th-53
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13865th1.9173rd-62
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17580th0.246119th+39
short-yardage conversion rate0.80038th0.5008th-30
points per trip inside the 403.190113th2.58321st-92
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.168104th0.249137th+33
havoc allowed by the front seven0.108110th0.169133rd+23
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06187th0.080116th+29
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.70023rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.