The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| BAY pass rush | 7.7% 13027th | 14.7% 2315th | faces TTU | 5.5% 9178th | 6.6% ~2.2 sacks |
| TTU pass rush | 4.5% 13280th | 9.2% 20758th | faces BAY | 3.3% 12037th | 3.9% ~1.3 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
TTU with the ball
| TTU offence vs BAY defence | TTU offence | BAY defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.27232nd | -0.11516th | -16 |
| success rate | 0.50521st | 0.32112th | -9 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.154104th | 1.13938th | -66 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.24227th | -0.2575th | -22 |
| rush: success rate | 0.52412th | 0.2808th | -4 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.851102nd | 0.97088th | -14 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.46722nd | -0.02525th | +3 |
| pass: success rate | 0.51722nd | 0.34423rd | +1 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.51379th | 1.2849th | -70 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.54831st | 0.3619th | -22 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.39720th | 0.25243rd | +23 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.28643rd | 2.50331st | -12 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.17785th | 0.264129th | +44 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.77453rd | 0.4004th | -49 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.59334th | 1.9585th | -29 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.177119th | 0.214127th | +8 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.09791st | 0.138122nd | +31 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.079125th | 0.076105th | -20 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 69.80083rd | — | — |
BAY with the ball
| BAY offence vs TTU defence | BAY offence | TTU defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.09298th | 0.00352nd | -46 |
| success rate | 0.401104th | 0.35334th | -70 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.26355th | 1.376117th | +62 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.05590th | 0.03872nd | -18 |
| rush: success rate | 0.44475th | 0.35940th | -35 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.86297th | 0.96987th | -10 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.17787th | 0.01933rd | -54 |
| pass: success rate | 0.373113th | 0.36338th | -75 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.75623rd | 1.62494th | +71 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.449109th | 0.37415th | -94 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.29888th | 0.31298th | +10 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.93895th | 2.96290th | -5 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16973rd | 0.19471st | -2 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.73777th | 0.66751st | -26 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.393100th | 2.57120th | -80 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.167102nd | 0.183103rd | +1 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.103102nd | 0.10176th | -26 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.06492nd | 0.083121st | +29 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 64.200133rd | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.