Middle Tennessee · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-21 14:00 · Elliott T. Bowers Stadium
Sam Houston · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

MTSUSHSUbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence5633Offence: points per play — defence3747Offence: success rate — offence3849Offence: success rate — defence1453Offence: explosiveness — offence2967Offence: explosiveness — defence7938Run game — offence6428Run game — defence447Pass game — offence4842Pass game — defence4088Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence8519Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence2225Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence8116Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence934

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsMTSU by 38SHSU by 42

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). SHSU wins about 53% of the time at a number like ours.

MTSU

Games4
Plays per game61.8
Drives per game9.5
SP+-16.0 (122nd, offence 123rd, defence 118th)
Returning production33% (pass 39%, rush 60%, receiving 26%)

SHSU

Games4
Plays per game70.0
Drives per game13.5
SP+-14.1 (117th, offence 113th, defence 112th)
Returning production58% (pass -31%, rush -3%, receiving 57%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceMTSUSHSU
pass rate, all downs56%17th59%7th
pass rate, standard downs49%18th52%7th
pass rate, 1st down52%17th56%5th
no-huddle share98%4th83%38th
pass rate, passing downs74%23rd73%26th
pass rate, red zone67%1st54%11th
seconds per play (own drives)30.048th29.852nd

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

MTSU offence

MTSU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.19824761 of 138
success rate0.42524786 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17124798 of 138
rush: points added per play0.16524750 of 138
rush: success rate0.44824770 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.88024789 of 138
pass: points added per play0.23924772 of 138
pass: success rate0.41524788 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.433247104 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.49424765 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.27824799 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.49724721 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13324731 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.73324779 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.18224756 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11324727 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05324715 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06124789 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.70024735 of 138

SHSU offence

SHSU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.10228093 of 138
success rate0.43928071 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.28328046 of 138
rush: points added per play0.040280100 of 138
rush: success rate0.47428045 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.824280108 of 138
pass: points added per play0.20428080 of 138
pass: success rate0.43428073 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.64228049 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.47728087 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.35328047 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.799280112 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.211280115 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.611280120 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.45828095 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.175280116 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111280116 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06428096 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.10028031 of 138

MTSU defence

MTSU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.10123987 of 138
success rate0.452239119 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.12023930 of 138
rush: points added per play0.05023978 of 138
rush: success rate0.463239118 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.00823994 of 138
pass: points added per play0.18623983 of 138
pass: success rate0.454239109 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.30023913 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.511239121 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.27923967 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.093239108 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.17623943 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.72423973 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.66723927 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11723910 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.07123919 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.04623932 of 138
opponent average starting field position73.900239105 of 138

SHSU defence

SHSU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.06526374 of 138
success rate0.38826366 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.25926386 of 138
rush: points added per play0.204263128 of 138
rush: success rate0.43426399 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.157263127 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.05826317 of 138
pass: success rate0.33026317 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.39626330 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.44526365 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.27826366 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.075263104 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.20326380 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.73726379 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.87526340 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.224263132 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.125263114 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.099263132 of 138
opponent average starting field position71.30026353 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs