Middle Tennessee · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-21 14:00 · Elliott T. Bowers Stadium
Sam Houston · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
SHSU pass rush7.4% 9430th11.4% 20222ndfaces MTSU4.6% 10961st6.0% ~2.0 sacks
MTSU pass rush1.3% 75130th6.1% 181123rdfaces SHSU7.1% 12698th4.2% ~1.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MTSU with the ball

MTSU offence vs SHSU defenceMTSU offenceSHSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.19861st0.06574th+13
success rate0.42586th0.38866th-20
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17198th1.25986th-12
rush: points added per play0.16550th0.204128th+78
rush: success rate0.44870th0.43499th+29
rush: explosiveness0.88089th1.157127th+38
pass: points added per play0.23972nd-0.05817th-55
pass: success rate0.41588th0.33017th-71
pass: explosiveness1.433104th1.39630th-74
standard downs: success rate0.49465th0.44565th0
passing downs: success rate0.27899th0.27866th-33
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.49721st3.075104th+83
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13331st0.20380th+49
short-yardage conversion rate0.73379th0.73779th0
points per trip inside the 404.18256th2.87540th-16
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11327th0.224132nd+105
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05315th0.125114th+99
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06189th0.099132nd+43
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.70035th——

SHSU with the ball

SHSU offence vs MTSU defenceSHSU offenceMTSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.10293rd0.10187th-6
success rate0.43971st0.452119th+48
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.28346th1.12030th-16
rush: points added per play0.040100th0.05078th-22
rush: success rate0.47445th0.463118th+73
rush: explosiveness0.824108th1.00894th-14
pass: points added per play0.20480th0.18683rd+3
pass: success rate0.43473rd0.454109th+36
pass: explosiveness1.64249th1.30013th-36
standard downs: success rate0.47787th0.511121st+34
passing downs: success rate0.35347th0.27967th+20
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.799112th3.093108th-4
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.211115th0.17643rd-72
short-yardage conversion rate0.611120th0.72473rd-47
points per trip inside the 403.45895th2.66727th-68
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.175116th0.11710th-106
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111116th0.07119th-97
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06496th0.04632nd-64
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.10031st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.