Western Kentucky · away
at
Final WKU 13 – 34 NMSU
Thursday 2026-10-01 20:00 · Aggie Memorial Stadium
New Mexico State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
NMSU pass rush4.2% 9586th9.4% 20356thfaces WKU3.7% 10944th3.9% ~1.3 sacks
WKU pass rush3.0% 67106th7.8% 17990thfaces NMSU3.3% 12236th3.1% ~1.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WKU with the ball

WKU offence vs NMSU defenceWKU offenceNMSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.006121st0.158108th-13
success rate0.375121st0.42394th-27
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.26156th1.23071st+15
rush: points added per play-0.105133rd0.150116th-17
rush: success rate0.406100th0.42587th-13
rush: explosiveness0.720128th1.01495th-33
pass: points added per play0.125101st0.19986th-15
pass: success rate0.359124th0.42191st-33
pass: explosiveness1.85613th1.46951st+38
standard downs: success rate0.433122nd0.47790th-32
passing downs: success rate0.276100th0.315100th0
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.695120th3.156109th-11
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.239130th0.18756th-74
short-yardage conversion rate0.71492nd0.889133rd+41
points per trip inside the 403.66783rd4.346124th+41
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15485th0.12114th-71
havoc allowed by the front seven0.119125th0.07935th-90
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03521st0.04222nd+1
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.50070th——

NMSU with the ball

NMSU offence vs WKU defenceNMSU offenceWKU defencerank gap
points added per play0.12183rd0.303134th+51
success rate0.43873rd0.446114th+41
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.39717th1.460134th+117
rush: points added per play0.04894th0.341137th+43
rush: success rate0.45466th0.464121st+55
rush: explosiveness0.99059th1.232134th+75
pass: points added per play0.28162nd0.24295th+33
pass: success rate0.44169th0.429100th+31
pass: explosiveness1.78021st1.727116th+95
standard downs: success rate0.47391st0.495108th+17
passing downs: success rate0.36040th0.329112th+72
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.04582nd3.504136th+54
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16869th0.14520th-49
short-yardage conversion rate0.684100th0.850123rd+23
points per trip inside the 403.76277th4.962131st+54
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.176117th0.12823rd-94
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09281st0.07427th-54
havoc allowed by the secondary0.085131st0.05450th-81
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.6003rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.