Marshall · away
at
JMU -18.5
Saturday 2026-10-03 15:45 · Bridgeforth Stadium
James Madison · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

MRSHJMUbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence2882Offence: points per play — defence1100Offence: success rate — offence3370Offence: success rate — defence6100Offence: explosiveness — offence4550Offence: explosiveness — defence2413Run game — offence682Run game — defence2887Pass game — offence6972Pass game — defence094Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence3861Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence1285Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence2488Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence9236

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsmarketMRSH by 40JMU by 40

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). MRSH wins about 48% of the time at a number like ours.

MRSH

Games4
Plays per game67.0
Drives per game11.8
SP+-12.5 (115th, offence 82nd, defence 134th)
Returning production99% (pass 100%, rush 210%, receiving 91%)

JMU

Games4
Plays per game67.2
Drives per game12.2
SP+9.9 (36th, offence 48th, defence 27th)
Returning production8% (pass 9%, rush 7%, receiving 9%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceMRSHJMU
pass rate, all downs48%69th46%89th
pass rate, standard downs38%100th41%76th
pass rate, 1st down35%113th46%46th
no-huddle share85%32nd90%22nd
pass rate, passing downs69%40th59%95th
pass rate, red zone43%45th33%92nd
seconds per play (own drives)29.560th27.790th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

MRSH offence

MRSH offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.08826899 of 138
success rate0.41826893 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21226876 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.086268130 of 138
rush: success rate0.41726894 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.851268101 of 138
pass: points added per play0.36526843 of 138
pass: success rate0.42526881 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.64726848 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.50026861 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.244268117 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.00226886 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.216268119 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.68426899 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.552268128 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.168268105 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.119268124 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04926860 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.30026827 of 138

JMU offence

JMU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.29326926 of 138
success rate0.47626942 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22326970 of 138
rush: points added per play0.24526926 of 138
rush: success rate0.49726927 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.00526955 of 138
pass: points added per play0.36826940 of 138
pass: success rate0.45826957 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.52726975 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.52526942 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.33826954 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.23126954 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15426954 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.77326954 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.56226936 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10426917 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06726924 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03726922 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.900269124 of 138

MRSH defence

MRSH defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.332269137 of 138
success rate0.472269130 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.322269105 of 138
rush: points added per play0.11226999 of 138
rush: success rate0.472269123 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.80226929 of 138
pass: points added per play0.533269138 of 138
pass: success rate0.471269120 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.819269123 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.544269135 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.28926981 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.276269122 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.15226927 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.812269110 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.174269118 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11926912 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.06726910 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05226943 of 138
opponent average starting field position71.70026962 of 138

JMU defence

JMU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.1972871 of 138
success rate0.2752871 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.380287120 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.14228719 of 138
rush: success rate0.2612872 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.061287108 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.1302879 of 138
pass: success rate0.2812873 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.687287108 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.3112871 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.23028730 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.36928722 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.19628773 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.818287112 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.47828718 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.17828789 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.118287106 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05928763 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.60028782 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs