Marshall · away
at
JMU -18.5
Saturday 2026-10-03 15:45 · Bridgeforth Stadium
James Madison · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
JMU pass rush11.5% 1137th10.6% 20833rdfaces MRSH2.6% 7817th7.0% ~2.3 sacks
MRSH pass rush1.9% 105125th5.4% 205132ndfaces JMU4.3% 9257th3.1% ~1.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MRSH with the ball

MRSH offence vs JMU defenceMRSH offenceJMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.08899th-0.1971st-98
success rate0.41893rd0.2751st-92
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21276th1.380120th+44
rush: points added per play-0.086130th-0.14219th-111
rush: success rate0.41794th0.2612nd-92
rush: explosiveness0.851101st1.061108th+7
pass: points added per play0.36543rd-0.1309th-34
pass: success rate0.42581st0.2813rd-78
pass: explosiveness1.64748th1.687108th+60
standard downs: success rate0.50061st0.3111st-60
passing downs: success rate0.244117th0.23030th-87
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.00286th2.36922nd-64
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.216119th0.19673rd-46
short-yardage conversion rate0.68499th0.818112th+13
points per trip inside the 402.552128th2.47818th-110
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.168105th0.17889th-16
havoc allowed by the front seven0.119124th0.118106th-18
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04960th0.05963rd+3
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.30027th——

JMU with the ball

JMU offence vs MRSH defenceJMU offenceMRSH defencerank gap
points added per play0.29326th0.332137th+111
success rate0.47642nd0.472130th+88
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22370th1.322105th+35
rush: points added per play0.24526th0.11299th+73
rush: success rate0.49727th0.472123rd+96
rush: explosiveness1.00555th0.80229th-26
pass: points added per play0.36840th0.533138th+98
pass: success rate0.45857th0.471120th+63
pass: explosiveness1.52775th1.819123rd+48
standard downs: success rate0.52542nd0.544135th+93
passing downs: success rate0.33854th0.28981st+27
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.23154th3.276122nd+68
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15454th0.15227th-27
short-yardage conversion rate0.77354th0.812110th+56
points per trip inside the 404.56236th4.174118th+82
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10417th0.11912th-5
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06724th0.06710th-14
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03722nd0.05243rd+21
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.900124th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.