UL Monroe · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-21 · time TBA · Kidd Brewer Stadium
App State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
APP pass rush2.8% 107112th10.6% 20834thfaces ULM7.1% 8497th5.0% ~1.6 sacks
ULM pass rush2.9% 103109th6.8% 235112thfaces APP2.7% 11219th2.8% ~0.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ULM with the ball

ULM offence vs APP defenceULM offenceAPP defencerank gap
points added per play-0.052130th0.08078th-52
success rate0.402103rd0.42392nd-11
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.119119th1.13234th-85
rush: points added per play0.07088th0.05179th-9
rush: success rate0.43286th0.43091st+5
rush: explosiveness0.87990th0.84338th-52
pass: points added per play-0.082134th0.13272nd-62
pass: success rate0.386106th0.41684th-22
pass: explosiveness1.406111th1.39731st-80
standard downs: success rate0.455105th0.510118th+13
passing downs: success rate0.275102nd0.21217th-85
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.96891st2.62045th-46
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15252nd0.227107th+55
short-yardage conversion rate0.571125th0.842119th-6
points per trip inside the 402.478131st3.72795th-36
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.170110th0.17684th-26
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10097th0.10783rd-14
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070112th0.07095th-17
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.90033rd——

APP with the ball

APP offence vs ULM defenceAPP offenceULM defencerank gap
points added per play0.23844th0.308135th+91
success rate0.45555th0.508137th+82
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.31234th1.21566th+32
rush: points added per play0.04893rd0.314136th+43
rush: success rate0.388112th0.522138th+26
rush: explosiveness1.07626th1.077115th+89
pass: points added per play0.47519th0.339118th+99
pass: success rate0.52417th0.500130th+113
pass: explosiveness1.46493rd1.41334th-59
standard downs: success rate0.459100th0.536133rd+33
passing downs: success rate0.4475th0.427136th+131
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.577128th3.418130th+2
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.239129th0.16132nd-97
short-yardage conversion rate0.667101st0.778102nd+1
points per trip inside the 403.69481st4.448125th+44
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12238th0.1158th-30
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08051st0.0648th-43
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04238th0.05142nd+4
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.90081st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.