Bowling Green · away
at
M-OH -13.5
Saturday 2026-10-03 15:30 · Yager Stadium
Miami (OH) · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
M-OH pass rush3.3% 123103rd4.8% 209137thfaces BGSU4.3% 7056th3.8% ~1.2 sacks
BGSU pass rush9.2% 6517th10.7% 17831stfaces M-OH4.0% 10148th6.6% ~2.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

BGSU with the ball

BGSU offence vs M-OH defenceBGSU offenceM-OH defencerank gap
points added per play-0.115136th0.179116th-20
success rate0.336135th0.450115th-20
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)0.958138th1.316102nd-36
rush: points added per play-0.261138th0.06583rd-55
rush: success rate0.302138th0.42586th-52
rush: explosiveness0.577136th0.98591st-45
pass: points added per play0.059111th0.372123rd+12
pass: success rate0.364119th0.483125th+6
pass: explosiveness1.447101st1.52962nd-39
standard downs: success rate0.431124th0.509117th-7
passing downs: success rate0.152137th0.341116th-21
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.431135th2.86069th-66
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.246133rd0.21798th-35
short-yardage conversion rate0.72780th0.778101st+21
points per trip inside the 401.188138th4.700129th-9
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.194129th0.1042nd-127
havoc allowed by the front seven0.138135th0.0659th-126
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05676th0.03813th-63
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.30053rd——

M-OH with the ball

M-OH offence vs BGSU defenceM-OH offenceBGSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.23943rd0.227127th+84
success rate0.43082nd0.492135th+53
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.42612th1.29493rd+81
rush: points added per play0.017111th0.251132nd+21
rush: success rate0.389111th0.520137th+26
rush: explosiveness0.87792nd1.216133rd+41
pass: points added per play0.6196th0.277106th+100
pass: success rate0.48737th0.477122nd+85
pass: explosiveness1.86711th1.43839th+28
standard downs: success rate0.48874th0.556136th+62
passing downs: success rate0.30183rd0.30694th+11
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.871100th3.436133rd+33
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212116th0.16936th-80
short-yardage conversion rate0.667104th0.73981st-23
points per trip inside the 403.90970th4.231121st+51
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14979th0.12013th-66
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111115th0.09156th-59
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03824th0.0292nd-22
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.00063rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.