Bowling Green · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-24 · time TBA · UB Stadium
Buffalo · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
BUF pass rush1.5% 65129th4.8% 145136thfaces BGSU4.3% 7056th2.9% ~1.0 sacks
BGSU pass rush9.2% 6517th10.7% 17831stfaces BUF2.9% 6926th6.1% ~2.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

BGSU with the ball

BGSU offence vs BUF defenceBGSU offenceBUF defencerank gap
points added per play-0.115136th0.11691st-45
success rate0.336135th0.36644th-91
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)0.958138th1.445131st-7
rush: points added per play-0.261138th0.01764th-74
rush: success rate0.302138th0.38556th-82
rush: explosiveness0.577136th0.92673rd-63
pass: points added per play0.059111th0.25197th-14
pass: success rate0.364119th0.36743rd-76
pass: explosiveness1.447101st1.955135th+34
standard downs: success rate0.431124th0.42954th-70
passing downs: success rate0.152137th0.25747th-90
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.431135th3.039100th-35
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.246133rd0.19265th-68
short-yardage conversion rate0.72780th0.62532nd-48
points per trip inside the 401.188138th3.53681st-57
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.194129th0.15253rd-76
havoc allowed by the front seven0.138135th0.07631st-104
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05676th0.076106th+30
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.30053rd——

BUF with the ball

BUF offence vs BGSU defenceBUF offenceBGSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.000122nd0.227127th+5
success rate0.333136th0.492135th-1
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21972nd1.29493rd+21
rush: points added per play-0.027120th0.251132nd+12
rush: success rate0.340133rd0.520137th+4
rush: explosiveness0.91882nd1.216133rd+51
pass: points added per play0.047114th0.277106th-8
pass: success rate0.324132nd0.477122nd-10
pass: explosiveness1.50283rd1.43839th-44
standard downs: success rate0.379134th0.556136th+2
passing downs: success rate0.240119th0.30694th-25
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.704119th3.436133rd+14
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19295th0.16936th-59
short-yardage conversion rate0.80034th0.73981st+47
points per trip inside the 404.25053rd4.231121st+68
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16397th0.12013th-84
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10198th0.09156th-42
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06290th0.0292nd-88
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.60039th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.