Western Michigan · away
at
WMU -14
Saturday 2026-10-03 13:00 · UB Stadium
Buffalo · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

WMUBUFbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence3012Offence: points per play — defence3834Offence: success rate — offence221Offence: success rate — defence969Offence: explosiveness — offence2848Offence: explosiveness — defence935Run game — offence5513Run game — defence5354Pass game — offence918Pass game — defence4230Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence2714Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence2628Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence6530Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence9862

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsmarketWMU by 50BUF by 30

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). WMU wins about 73% of the time at a number like ours.

WMU

Games4
Plays per game61.2
Drives per game10.8
SP+-7.2 (96th, offence 113th, defence 72nd)
Returning production100% (pass 100%, rush 100%, receiving 100%)

BUF

Games4
Plays per game76.5
Drives per game14.0
SP+-17.2 (124th, offence 129th, defence 107th)
Returning production-1% (pass 9%, rush 9%, receiving -7%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceWMUBUF
pass rate, all downs43%109th49%62nd
pass rate, standard downs39%89th41%74th
pass rate, 1st down46%49th39%97th
no-huddle share19%113th82%44th
pass rate, passing downs50%128th65%58th
pass rate, red zone18%131st45%35th
seconds per play (own drives)33.63rd24.4133rd

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

WMU offence

WMU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.09324597 of 138
success rate0.400245108 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.16724599 of 138
rush: points added per play0.14724563 of 138
rush: success rate0.41324597 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.97924564 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.006245126 of 138
pass: success rate0.380245111 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.426245106 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.450245108 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.30624575 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.870245101 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16724567 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.73724578 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.36424542 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13124549 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09424586 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03724523 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60024592 of 138

BUF offence

BUF offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.000306122 of 138
success rate0.333306136 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21930672 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.027306120 of 138
rush: success rate0.340306133 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.91830682 of 138
pass: points added per play0.047306114 of 138
pass: success rate0.324306132 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.50230683 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.379306134 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.240306119 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.704306119 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19230695 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.80030634 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.25030653 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16330697 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10130698 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06230690 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.60030639 of 138

WMU defence

WMU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.09926986 of 138
success rate0.465269125 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.02526910 of 138
rush: points added per play0.02226966 of 138
rush: success rate0.450269108 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.72026918 of 138
pass: points added per play0.17326981 of 138
pass: success rate0.464269115 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.44026942 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.47726991 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.432269137 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.051269103 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.17226941 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.72026970 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.65026989 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.1082694 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.0562693 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05226945 of 138
opponent average starting field position76.300269132 of 138

BUF defence

BUF defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.11627691 of 138
success rate0.36627644 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.445276131 of 138
rush: points added per play0.01727664 of 138
rush: success rate0.38527656 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.92627673 of 138
pass: points added per play0.25127697 of 138
pass: success rate0.36727643 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.955276135 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.42927654 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.25727647 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.039276100 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.19227665 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.62527632 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.53627681 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15227653 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.07627631 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.076276106 of 138
opponent average starting field position68.20027615 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs