Charlotte · away
at
Final CLT 21 – 26 APP
Saturday 2026-09-19 18:00 · Kidd Brewer Stadium
App State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
APP pass rush2.8% 107112th10.6% 20834thfaces CLT3.2% 9334th3.0% ~1.0 sacks
CLT pass rush3.7% 10994th11.5% 20921stfaces APP2.7% 11219th3.2% ~1.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

CLT with the ball

CLT offence vs APP defenceCLT offenceAPP defencerank gap
points added per play-0.095134th0.08078th-56
success rate0.362126th0.42392nd-34
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.060132nd1.13234th-98
rush: points added per play-0.155135th0.05179th-56
rush: success rate0.365123rd0.43091st-32
rush: explosiveness0.760125th0.84338th-87
pass: points added per play0.024118th0.13272nd-46
pass: success rate0.376112th0.41684th-28
pass: explosiveness1.288128th1.39731st-97
standard downs: success rate0.444112th0.510118th+6
passing downs: success rate0.205133rd0.21217th-116
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.384137th2.62045th-92
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.279137th0.227107th-30
short-yardage conversion rate0.571123rd0.842119th-4
points per trip inside the 402.312133rd3.72795th-38
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.173114th0.17684th-30
havoc allowed by the front seven0.103103rd0.10783rd-20
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070110th0.07095th-15
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.90017th——

APP with the ball

APP offence vs CLT defenceAPP offenceCLT defencerank gap
points added per play0.23844th0.165113th+69
success rate0.45555th0.472129th+74
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.31234th1.18150th+16
rush: points added per play0.04893rd0.09794th+1
rush: success rate0.388112th0.43394th-18
rush: explosiveness1.07626th1.102119th+93
pass: points added per play0.47519th0.343120th+101
pass: success rate0.52417th0.520137th+120
pass: explosiveness1.46493rd1.29412th-81
standard downs: success rate0.459100th0.48295th-5
passing downs: success rate0.4475th0.449138th+133
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.577128th2.79363rd-65
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.239129th0.247120th-9
short-yardage conversion rate0.667101st0.800107th+6
points per trip inside the 403.69481st4.037113th+32
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12238th0.13736th-2
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08051st0.10680th+29
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04238th0.0325th-33
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.90081st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.