Memphis · away
at
Final MEM 27 – 21 UNLV
Saturday 2026-08-29 22:00 · Allegiant Stadium
UNLV · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UNLV pass rush8.3% 13223rd8.9% 25865thfaces MEM5.7% 7082nd7.0% ~2.3 sacks
MEM pass rush8.6% 10521st10.4% 21235thfaces UNLV7.9% 127107th8.2% ~2.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MEM with the ball

MEM offence vs UNLV defenceMEM offenceUNLV defencerank gap
points added per play0.26236th0.07676th+40
success rate0.47246th0.40476th+30
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.37021st1.15443rd+22
rush: points added per play0.18245th0.124106th+61
rush: success rate0.45864th0.477127th+63
rush: explosiveness1.00853rd0.74723rd-30
pass: points added per play0.54512th0.11866th+54
pass: success rate0.51424th0.35129th+5
pass: explosiveness1.82816th1.696110th+94
standard downs: success rate0.51646th0.46684th+38
passing downs: success rate0.35346th0.28679th+33
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.46424th3.606138th+114
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14845th0.13313th-32
short-yardage conversion rate0.75067th0.833117th+50
points per trip inside the 404.60932nd3.47877th+45
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12642nd0.16170th+28
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06725th0.07120th-5
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05982nd0.090128th+46
average starting field position (yards from own goal)76.9001st——

UNLV with the ball

UNLV offence vs MEM defenceUNLV offenceMEM defencerank gap
points added per play0.053107th0.180117th+10
success rate0.384118th0.41889th-29
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21973rd1.400124th+51
rush: points added per play0.06189th0.290134th+45
rush: success rate0.397106th0.463117th+11
rush: explosiveness0.90883rd1.104120th+37
pass: points added per play0.13597th0.11564th-33
pass: success rate0.389102nd0.38863rd-39
pass: explosiveness1.61053rd1.709111th+58
standard downs: success rate0.456104th0.503113th+9
passing downs: success rate0.227127th0.26048th-79
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.21956th3.389127th+71
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13025th0.12711th-14
short-yardage conversion rate0.667108th0.842121st+13
points per trip inside the 402.955123rd3.60085th-38
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15791st0.14947th-44
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09689th0.09158th-31
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06083rd0.05860th-23
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.60040th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.