Michigan · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 · time TBA · SHI Stadium
Rutgers · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
RUTG pass rush3.5% 8695th7.6% 18593rdfaces MICH4.0% 10050th3.7% ~1.2 sacks
MICH pass rush9.8% 11212th12.6% 23015thfaces RUTG7.4% 108100th8.6% ~2.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MICH with the ball

MICH offence vs RUTG defenceMICH offenceRUTG defencerank gap
points added per play0.16466th0.149101st+35
success rate0.43577th0.436103rd+26
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17496th1.20258th-38
rush: points added per play0.034103rd0.117103rd0
rush: success rate0.401103rd0.464120th+17
rush: explosiveness0.781118th0.90065th-53
pass: points added per play0.43326th0.307114th+88
pass: success rate0.49532nd0.41583rd+51
pass: explosiveness1.63451st1.58985th+34
standard downs: success rate0.449110th0.497110th0
passing downs: success rate0.39719th0.29787th+68
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.17064th3.00293rd+29
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12721st0.20077th+56
short-yardage conversion rate0.75068th0.75086th+18
points per trip inside the 403.280108th3.65290th-18
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13460th0.13737th-23
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07340th0.10073rd+33
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06188th0.03712th-76
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10015th——

RUTG with the ball

RUTG offence vs MICH defenceRUTG offenceMICH defencerank gap
points added per play0.13577th-0.09021st-56
success rate0.48237th0.3119th-28
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30140th1.20057th+17
rush: points added per play0.024106th-0.13322nd-84
rush: success rate0.48934th0.31416th-18
rush: explosiveness0.766123rd0.72821st-102
pass: points added per play0.33449th-0.06416th-33
pass: success rate0.47745th0.31012th-33
pass: explosiveness1.86112th1.684106th+94
standard downs: success rate0.50852nd0.37716th-36
passing downs: success rate0.41812th0.2009th-3
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13369th2.62848th-21
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16161st0.223102nd+41
short-yardage conversion rate0.70094th0.71467th-27
points per trip inside the 403.96367th2.0537th-60
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14676th0.17890th+14
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06222nd0.137120th+98
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084129th0.04118th-111
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.00099th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.