Rutgers · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-24 · time TBA · Ryan Field
Northwestern · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
NU pass rush4.9% 6174th7.0% 129109thfaces RUTG7.4% 108100th6.2% ~2.0 sacks
RUTG pass rush3.5% 8695th7.6% 18593rdfaces NU8.9% 56121st6.2% ~2.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

RUTG with the ball

RUTG offence vs NU defenceRUTG offenceNU defencerank gap
points added per play0.13577th0.08380th+3
success rate0.48237th0.441106th+69
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30140th1.12032nd-8
rush: points added per play0.024106th0.112100th-6
rush: success rate0.48934th0.472124th+90
rush: explosiveness0.766123rd0.86846th-77
pass: points added per play0.33449th0.03538th-11
pass: success rate0.47745th0.40574th+29
pass: explosiveness1.86112th1.40633rd+21
standard downs: success rate0.50852nd0.515123rd+71
passing downs: success rate0.41812th0.22827th+15
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13369th3.429131st+62
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16161st0.14217th-44
short-yardage conversion rate0.70094th0.59122nd-72
points per trip inside the 403.96367th2.42117th-50
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14676th0.16272nd-4
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06222nd0.0637th-15
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084129th0.099131st+2
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.00099th——

NU with the ball

NU offence vs RUTG defenceNU offenceRUTG defencerank gap
points added per play0.30421st0.149101st+80
success rate0.46349th0.436103rd+54
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.29445th1.20258th+13
rush: points added per play0.15654th0.117103rd+49
rush: success rate0.41098th0.464120th+22
rush: explosiveness0.97865th0.90065th0
pass: points added per play0.54013th0.307114th+101
pass: success rate0.53713th0.41583rd+70
pass: explosiveness1.64946th1.58985th+39
standard downs: success rate0.48578th0.497110th+32
passing downs: success rate0.41114th0.29787th+73
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.835104th3.00293rd-11
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19093rd0.20077th-16
short-yardage conversion rate0.81829th0.75086th+57
points per trip inside the 405.11112th3.65290th+78
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13356th0.13737th-19
havoc allowed by the front seven0.112117th0.10073rd-44
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0214th0.03712th+8
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.40041st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.