Rutgers · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-17 · time TBA · SECU Stadium
Maryland · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
MD pass rush5.7% 8856th8.1% 18581stfaces RUTG7.4% 108100th6.5% ~2.2 sacks
RUTG pass rush3.5% 8695th7.6% 18593rdfaces MD3.2% 12630th3.3% ~1.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

RUTG with the ball

RUTG offence vs MD defenceRUTG offenceMD defencerank gap
points added per play0.13577th0.02967th-10
success rate0.48237th0.38060th+23
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30140th1.22167th+27
rush: points added per play0.024106th-0.05139th-67
rush: success rate0.48934th0.36746th+12
rush: explosiveness0.766123rd0.87856th-67
pass: points added per play0.33449th0.16978th+29
pass: success rate0.47745th0.41888th+43
pass: explosiveness1.86112th1.57279th+67
standard downs: success rate0.50852nd0.41643rd-9
passing downs: success rate0.41812th0.319106th+94
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.13369th2.33418th-51
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16161st0.227108th+47
short-yardage conversion rate0.70094th0.70663rd-31
points per trip inside the 403.96367th4.150117th+50
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14676th0.15965th-11
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06222nd0.11497th+75
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084129th0.04531st-98
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.00099th——

MD with the ball

MD offence vs RUTG defenceMD offenceRUTG defencerank gap
points added per play0.13279th0.149101st+22
success rate0.45257th0.436103rd+46
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.23963rd1.20258th-5
rush: points added per play0.13867th0.117103rd+36
rush: success rate0.43584th0.464120th+36
rush: explosiveness1.04240th0.90065th+25
pass: points added per play0.12999th0.307114th+15
pass: success rate0.46156th0.41583rd+27
pass: explosiveness1.400115th1.58985th-30
standard downs: success rate0.50753rd0.497110th+57
passing downs: success rate0.30973rd0.29787th+14
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.88299th3.00293rd-6
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.234126th0.20077th-49
short-yardage conversion rate0.71489th0.75086th-3
points per trip inside the 403.43398th3.65290th-8
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14371st0.13737th-34
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08564th0.10073rd+9
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05878th0.03712th-66
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.20075th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.