Western Michigan · away
at
Final WMU 12 – 13 MICH
Saturday 2026-09-05 19:30 · Michigan Stadium
Michigan · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
MICH pass rush9.8% 11212th12.6% 23015thfaces WMU5.4% 7475th7.6% ~2.5 sacks
WMU pass rush3.0% 66105th5.8% 174128thfaces MICH4.0% 10050th3.5% ~1.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WMU with the ball

WMU offence vs MICH defenceWMU offenceMICH defencerank gap
points added per play0.09397th-0.09021st-76
success rate0.400108th0.3119th-99
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.16799th1.20057th-42
rush: points added per play0.14763rd-0.13322nd-41
rush: success rate0.41397th0.31416th-81
rush: explosiveness0.97964th0.72821st-43
pass: points added per play-0.006126th-0.06416th-110
pass: success rate0.380111th0.31012th-99
pass: explosiveness1.426106th1.684106th0
standard downs: success rate0.450108th0.37716th-92
passing downs: success rate0.30675th0.2009th-66
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.870101st2.62848th-53
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16767th0.223102nd+35
short-yardage conversion rate0.73778th0.71467th-11
points per trip inside the 404.36442nd2.0537th-35
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13149th0.17890th+41
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09486th0.137120th+34
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03723rd0.04118th-5
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60092nd——

MICH with the ball

MICH offence vs WMU defenceMICH offenceWMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.16466th0.09986th+20
success rate0.43577th0.465125th+48
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17496th1.02510th-86
rush: points added per play0.034103rd0.02266th-37
rush: success rate0.401103rd0.450108th+5
rush: explosiveness0.781118th0.72018th-100
pass: points added per play0.43326th0.17381st+55
pass: success rate0.49532nd0.464115th+83
pass: explosiveness1.63451st1.44042nd-9
standard downs: success rate0.449110th0.47791st-19
passing downs: success rate0.39719th0.432137th+118
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.17064th3.051103rd+39
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12721st0.17241st+20
short-yardage conversion rate0.75068th0.72070th+2
points per trip inside the 403.280108th3.65089th-19
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13460th0.1084th-56
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07340th0.0563rd-37
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06188th0.05245th-43
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.10015th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.