Stanford · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 · time TBA · L&N Federal Credit Union Stadium
Louisville · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

STANLOUbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence4292Offence: points per play — defence436Offence: success rate — offence1983Offence: success rate — defence1246Offence: explosiveness — offence5684Offence: explosiveness — defence1545Run game — offence1872Run game — defence1462Pass game — offence4788Pass game — defence410Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence1720Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence1629Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence7250Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence8677

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsSTAN by 17LOU by 63

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). LOU wins about 93% of the time at a number like ours.

STAN

Games4
Plays per game68.0
Drives per game11.8
SP+-8.4 (102nd, offence 98th, defence 98th)
Returning production21% (pass -1%, rush 135%, receiving 31%)

LOU

Games4
Plays per game67.5
Drives per game12.8
SP+9.9 (36th, offence 19th, defence 66th)
Returning production35% (pass 0%, rush 85%, receiving 18%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceSTANLOU
pass rate, all downs57%12th46%86th
pass rate, standard downs48%24th39%91st
pass rate, 1st down45%53rd41%87th
no-huddle share61%70th31%101st
pass rate, passing downs77%13th68%51st
pass rate, red zone54%10th36%82nd
seconds per play (own drives)26.4112th28.083rd

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

STAN offence

STAN offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.13027280 of 138
success rate0.393272112 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24927261 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.002272114 of 138
rush: success rate0.398272105 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.796272113 of 138
pass: points added per play0.23027274 of 138
pass: success rate0.386272105 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.60227256 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.46427296 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.253272114 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.760272115 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212272117 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.76927256 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.261272109 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12527240 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07427243 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05127263 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.60027213 of 138

LOU offence

LOU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.34427012 of 138
success rate0.50027024 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.35327023 of 138
rush: points added per play0.20327039 of 138
rush: success rate0.48627035 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.03427043 of 138
pass: points added per play0.48727018 of 138
pass: success rate0.51627023 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.66327043 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.56327016 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.32427064 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.809270111 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19427096 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.72227084 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.39327040 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14127070 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111270114 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03027013 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.80027082 of 138

STAN defence

STAN defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.281288133 of 138
success rate0.458288122 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.377288118 of 138
rush: points added per play0.158288119 of 138
rush: success rate0.458288112 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.128288124 of 138
pass: points added per play0.456288132 of 138
pass: success rate0.466288116 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.59228886 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.495288107 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.383288132 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.222288116 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.14528819 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.812288111 of 138
points per trip inside the 405.000288132 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12828820 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.08028836 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.04928840 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.00028868 of 138

LOU defence

LOU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.10628689 of 138
success rate0.40228675 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.23828676 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.01528653 of 138
rush: success rate0.43028692 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.71028615 of 138
pass: points added per play0.378286124 of 138
pass: success rate0.38128658 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.964286136 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.45528676 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.27428661 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.02128698 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.1212866 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.51728611 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.61528687 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13628633 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.07328623 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.06328674 of 138
opponent average starting field position71.10028652 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs