Stanford · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 · time TBA · L&N Federal Credit Union Stadium
Louisville · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
LOU pass rush5.2% 9666th6.5% 214115thfaces STAN3.3% 15335th4.2% ~1.4 sacks
STAN pass rush2.6% 151116th9.0% 27863rdfaces LOU7.4% 94102nd5.0% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

STAN with the ball

STAN offence vs LOU defenceSTAN offenceLOU defencerank gap
points added per play0.13080th0.10689th+9
success rate0.393112th0.40275th-37
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24961st1.23876th+15
rush: points added per play-0.002114th-0.01553rd-61
rush: success rate0.398105th0.43092nd-13
rush: explosiveness0.796113th0.71015th-98
pass: points added per play0.23074th0.378124th+50
pass: success rate0.386105th0.38158th-47
pass: explosiveness1.60256th1.964136th+80
standard downs: success rate0.46496th0.45576th-20
passing downs: success rate0.253114th0.27461st-53
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.760115th3.02198th-17
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212117th0.1216th-111
short-yardage conversion rate0.76956th0.51711th-45
points per trip inside the 403.261109th3.61587th-22
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12540th0.13633rd-7
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07443rd0.07323rd-20
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05163rd0.06374th+11
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.60013th——

LOU with the ball

LOU offence vs STAN defenceLOU offenceSTAN defencerank gap
points added per play0.34412th0.281133rd+121
success rate0.50024th0.458122nd+98
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.35323rd1.377118th+95
rush: points added per play0.20339th0.158119th+80
rush: success rate0.48635th0.458112th+77
rush: explosiveness1.03443rd1.128124th+81
pass: points added per play0.48718th0.456132nd+114
pass: success rate0.51623rd0.466116th+93
pass: explosiveness1.66343rd1.59286th+43
standard downs: success rate0.56316th0.495107th+91
passing downs: success rate0.32464th0.383132nd+68
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.809111th3.222116th+5
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19496th0.14519th-77
short-yardage conversion rate0.72284th0.812111th+27
points per trip inside the 404.39340th5.000132nd+92
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14170th0.12820th-50
havoc allowed by the front seven0.111114th0.08036th-78
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03013th0.04940th+27
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.80082nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.