The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| CLEM pass rush | 5.3% 15265th | 6.3% 284119th | faces MIA | 2.9% 10525th | 4.1% ~1.3 sacks |
| MIA pass rush | 5.8% 12152nd | 8.0% 17687th | faces CLEM | 8.6% 117117th | 7.2% ~2.4 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
MIA with the ball
| MIA offence vs CLEM defence | MIA offence | CLEM defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.4422nd | 0.01758th | +56 |
| success rate | 0.5713rd | 0.41083rd | +80 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.27850th | 1.18854th | +4 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.12372nd | 0.203127th | +55 |
| rush: success rate | 0.51121st | 0.492132nd | +111 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.98263rd | 0.88759th | -4 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.8391st | -0.05519th | +18 |
| pass: success rate | 0.6541st | 0.34424th | +23 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.48988th | 1.56373rd | -15 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.6302nd | 0.43055th | +53 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.37529th | 0.368128th | +99 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.8874th | 3.459135th | +131 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.12115th | 0.12912th | -3 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.81231st | 0.72774th | +43 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 5.05714th | 2.34616th | +2 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.0684th | 0.16067th | +63 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.0469th | 0.07322nd | +13 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.0213rd | 0.087125th | +122 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 70.00079th | — | — |
CLEM with the ball
| CLEM offence vs MIA defence | CLEM offence | MIA defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | -0.027125th | -0.04931st | -94 |
| success rate | 0.342132nd | 0.32514th | -118 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.17594th | 1.14942nd | -52 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.09382nd | -0.15814th | -68 |
| rush: success rate | 0.368120th | 0.2571st | -119 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.02049th | 0.71916th | -33 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.001124th | 0.02435th | -89 |
| pass: success rate | 0.328131st | 0.36235th | -96 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.400114th | 1.30314th | -100 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.405129th | 0.37917th | -112 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.228125th | 0.22928th | -97 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.764114th | 2.1537th | -107 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.211114th | 0.270130th | +16 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.80035th | 0.57116th | -19 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.095117th | 2.30815th | -102 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.188127th | 0.16271st | -56 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.146136th | 0.09664th | -72 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.04239th | 0.06687th | +48 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 70.40071st | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.