Georgia Tech · away
at
Final GT 27 – 34 STAN
Saturday 2026-09-26 22:30 · Stanford Stadium
Stanford · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

GTSTANbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence4542Offence: points per play — defence244Offence: success rate — offence5119Offence: success rate — defence3912Offence: explosiveness — offence4956Offence: explosiveness — defence3715Run game — offence4718Run game — defence3414Pass game — offence3947Pass game — defence124Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence4517Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence4216Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence3172Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence5186

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsmarketGT by 41STAN by 39

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). GT wins about 53% of the time at a number like ours.

GT

Games4
Plays per game65.0
Drives per game10.5
SP+-0.1 (69th, offence 66th, defence 76th)
Returning production13% (pass 0%, rush 35%, receiving 11%)

STAN

Games4
Plays per game68.0
Drives per game11.8
SP+-8.4 (102nd, offence 98th, defence 98th)
Returning production21% (pass -1%, rush 135%, receiving 31%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceGTSTAN
pass rate, all downs53%34th57%12th
pass rate, standard downs44%47th48%24th
pass rate, 1st down42%78th45%53rd
no-huddle share33%98th61%70th
pass rate, passing downs71%33rd77%13th
pass rate, red zone48%26th54%10th
seconds per play (own drives)28.875th26.4112th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

GT offence

GT offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.14126076 of 138
success rate0.44226068 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22126071 of 138
rush: points added per play0.11226073 of 138
rush: success rate0.45226067 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.88526087 of 138
pass: points added per play0.19126084 of 138
pass: success rate0.44326068 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.51326078 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.50026060 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.31226071 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07426076 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.202260106 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.70626093 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.393260101 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16226095 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.104260105 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05826077 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60026066 of 138

STAN offence

STAN offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.13027280 of 138
success rate0.393272112 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24927261 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.002272114 of 138
rush: success rate0.398272105 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.796272113 of 138
pass: points added per play0.23027274 of 138
pass: success rate0.386272105 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.60227256 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.46427296 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.253272114 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.760272115 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212272117 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.76927256 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.261272109 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12527240 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07427243 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05127263 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.60027213 of 138

GT defence

GT defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.155281105 of 138
success rate0.41328185 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.26728187 of 138
rush: points added per play0.08228191 of 138
rush: success rate0.447281107 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.86528145 of 138
pass: points added per play0.343281121 of 138
pass: success rate0.36628141 of 138
pass: explosiveness2.089281138 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.44728168 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.341281115 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.90628180 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.17128138 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.68428154 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.65428191 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16028168 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.121281110 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.03928115 of 138
opponent average starting field position70.40028140 of 138

STAN defence

STAN defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.281288133 of 138
success rate0.458288122 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.377288118 of 138
rush: points added per play0.158288119 of 138
rush: success rate0.458288112 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.128288124 of 138
pass: points added per play0.456288132 of 138
pass: success rate0.466288116 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.59228886 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.495288107 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.383288132 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.222288116 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.14528819 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.812288111 of 138
points per trip inside the 405.000288132 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12828820 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.08028836 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.04928840 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.00028868 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs