Georgia Tech · away
at
Final GT 27 – 34 STAN
Saturday 2026-09-26 22:30 · Stanford Stadium
Stanford · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
STAN pass rush2.6% 151116th9.0% 27863rdfaces GT8.3% 109112th5.5% ~1.8 sacks
GT pass rush3.5% 8797th8.1% 21182ndfaces STAN3.3% 15335th3.4% ~1.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

GT with the ball

GT offence vs STAN defenceGT offenceSTAN defencerank gap
points added per play0.14176th0.281133rd+57
success rate0.44268th0.458122nd+54
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22171st1.377118th+47
rush: points added per play0.11273rd0.158119th+46
rush: success rate0.45267th0.458112th+45
rush: explosiveness0.88587th1.128124th+37
pass: points added per play0.19184th0.456132nd+48
pass: success rate0.44368th0.466116th+48
pass: explosiveness1.51378th1.59286th+8
standard downs: success rate0.50060th0.495107th+47
passing downs: success rate0.31271st0.383132nd+61
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07476th3.222116th+40
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.202106th0.14519th-87
short-yardage conversion rate0.70693rd0.812111th+18
points per trip inside the 403.393101st5.000132nd+31
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16295th0.12820th-75
havoc allowed by the front seven0.104105th0.08036th-69
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05877th0.04940th-37
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.60066th——

STAN with the ball

STAN offence vs GT defenceSTAN offenceGT defencerank gap
points added per play0.13080th0.155105th+25
success rate0.393112th0.41385th-27
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24961st1.26787th+26
rush: points added per play-0.002114th0.08291st-23
rush: success rate0.398105th0.447107th+2
rush: explosiveness0.796113th0.86545th-68
pass: points added per play0.23074th0.343121st+47
pass: success rate0.386105th0.36641st-64
pass: explosiveness1.60256th2.089138th+82
standard downs: success rate0.46496th0.44768th-28
passing downs: success rate0.253114th0.341115th+1
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.760115th2.90680th-35
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.212117th0.17138th-79
short-yardage conversion rate0.76956th0.68454th-2
points per trip inside the 403.261109th3.65491st-18
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12540th0.16068th+28
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07443rd0.121110th+67
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05163rd0.03915th-48
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.60013th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.