Arizona State · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · FBC Mortgage Stadium
UCF · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UCF pass rush5.7% 12354th10.1% 21940thfaces ASU3.6% 5639th4.6% ~1.5 sacks
ASU pass rush4.9% 6173rd10.7% 13130thfaces UCF4.2% 7153rd4.6% ~1.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ASU with the ball

ASU offence vs UCF defenceASU offenceUCF defencerank gap
points added per play0.058105th-0.04732nd-73
success rate0.41697th0.34325th-72
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.39618th1.27591st+73
rush: points added per play0.018110th-0.11923rd-87
rush: success rate0.396107th0.30714th-93
rush: explosiveness1.05037th0.87250th+13
pass: points added per play0.18685th0.07756th-29
pass: success rate0.44765th0.38560th-5
pass: explosiveness1.74327th1.59587th+60
standard downs: success rate0.46397th0.40031st-66
passing downs: success rate0.31867th0.24839th-28
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.690122nd2.29113th-109
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.198101st0.241114th+13
short-yardage conversion rate0.77850th0.62534th-16
points per trip inside the 403.60088th2.30414th-74
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16396th0.17382nd-14
havoc allowed by the front seven0.104104th0.11192nd-12
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05981st0.06273rd-8
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.000109th——

UCF with the ball

UCF offence vs ASU defenceUCF offenceASU defencerank gap
points added per play0.11985th0.02363rd-22
success rate0.43676th0.37050th-26
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.20681st1.17949th-32
rush: points added per play0.18046th-0.02645th-1
rush: success rate0.44574th0.39462nd-12
rush: explosiveness1.16512th0.83834th+22
pass: points added per play0.053113th0.09660th-53
pass: success rate0.42679th0.33721st-58
pass: explosiveness1.278130th1.60090th-40
standard downs: success rate0.49467th0.45172nd+5
passing downs: success rate0.29987th0.22422nd-65
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.05280th2.90781st+1
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17278th0.14923rd-55
short-yardage conversion rate0.80041st0.63636th-5
points per trip inside the 404.76921st2.68428th+7
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13765th0.15964th-1
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09792nd0.09055th-37
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04034th0.06992nd+58
average starting field position (yards from own goal)63.200136th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.