Arizona · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 · time TBA · Jones AT&T Stadium
Texas Tech · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TTU pass rush4.5% 13280th9.2% 20758thfaces ARIZ8.8% 113120th6.7% ~2.2 sacks
ARIZ pass rush4.4% 11482nd8.8% 19268thfaces TTU5.5% 9178th4.9% ~1.6 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ARIZ with the ball

ARIZ offence vs TTU defenceARIZ offenceTTU defencerank gap
points added per play0.21356th0.00352nd-4
success rate0.50022nd0.35334th+12
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.151106th1.376117th+11
rush: points added per play0.14762nd0.03872nd+10
rush: success rate0.52114th0.35940th+26
rush: explosiveness0.696132nd0.96987th-45
pass: points added per play0.28161st0.01933rd-28
pass: success rate0.49333rd0.36338th+5
pass: explosiveness1.51080th1.62494th+14
standard downs: success rate0.53635th0.37415th-20
passing downs: success rate0.41911th0.31298th+87
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.53417th2.96290th+73
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.11812th0.19471st+59
short-yardage conversion rate0.85014th0.66751st+37
points per trip inside the 404.32146th2.57120th-26
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11430th0.183103rd+73
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07544th0.10176th+32
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03930th0.083121st+91
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.20056th——

TTU with the ball

TTU offence vs ARIZ defenceTTU offenceARIZ defencerank gap
points added per play0.27232nd0.00250th+18
success rate0.50521st0.35231st+10
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.154104th1.415127th+23
rush: points added per play0.24227th0.01865th+38
rush: success rate0.52412th0.34733rd+21
rush: explosiveness0.851102nd1.072110th+8
pass: points added per play0.46722nd0.05346th+24
pass: success rate0.51722nd0.35630th+8
pass: explosiveness1.51379th1.60191st+12
standard downs: success rate0.54831st0.40332nd+1
passing downs: success rate0.39720th0.27764th+44
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.28643rd2.58942nd-1
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17785th0.253125th+40
short-yardage conversion rate0.77453rd1.000137th+84
points per trip inside the 404.59334th2.82435th+1
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.177119th0.16878th-41
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09791st0.10888th-3
havoc allowed by the secondary0.079125th0.06064th-61
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.80083rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.