Arizona State · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-17 · time TBA · Jones AT&T Stadium
Texas Tech · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TTU pass rush4.5% 13280th9.2% 20758thfaces ASU3.6% 5639th4.1% ~1.3 sacks
ASU pass rush4.9% 6173rd10.7% 13130thfaces TTU5.5% 9178th5.2% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ASU with the ball

ASU offence vs TTU defenceASU offenceTTU defencerank gap
points added per play0.058105th0.00352nd-53
success rate0.41697th0.35334th-63
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.39618th1.376117th+99
rush: points added per play0.018110th0.03872nd-38
rush: success rate0.396107th0.35940th-67
rush: explosiveness1.05037th0.96987th+50
pass: points added per play0.18685th0.01933rd-52
pass: success rate0.44765th0.36338th-27
pass: explosiveness1.74327th1.62494th+67
standard downs: success rate0.46397th0.37415th-82
passing downs: success rate0.31867th0.31298th+31
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.690122nd2.96290th-32
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.198101st0.19471st-30
short-yardage conversion rate0.77850th0.66751st+1
points per trip inside the 403.60088th2.57120th-68
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16396th0.183103rd+7
havoc allowed by the front seven0.104104th0.10176th-28
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05981st0.083121st+40
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.000109th——

TTU with the ball

TTU offence vs ASU defenceTTU offenceASU defencerank gap
points added per play0.27232nd0.02363rd+31
success rate0.50521st0.37050th+29
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.154104th1.17949th-55
rush: points added per play0.24227th-0.02645th+18
rush: success rate0.52412th0.39462nd+50
rush: explosiveness0.851102nd0.83834th-68
pass: points added per play0.46722nd0.09660th+38
pass: success rate0.51722nd0.33721st-1
pass: explosiveness1.51379th1.60090th+11
standard downs: success rate0.54831st0.45172nd+41
passing downs: success rate0.39720th0.22422nd+2
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.28643rd2.90781st+38
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17785th0.14923rd-62
short-yardage conversion rate0.77453rd0.63636th-17
points per trip inside the 404.59334th2.68428th-6
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.177119th0.15964th-55
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09791st0.09055th-36
havoc allowed by the secondary0.079125th0.06992nd-33
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.80083rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.