Missouri State · away
at
Final MOST 0 – 50 TA&M
Saturday 2026-09-05 19:00 · Kyle Field
Texas A&M · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

MOSTTA&Mbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence3220Offence: points per play — defence751Offence: success rate — offence2352Offence: success rate — defence055Offence: explosiveness — offence525Offence: explosiveness — defence9629Run game — offence2242Run game — defence3077Pass game — offence4614Pass game — defence934Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence3759Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence958Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence2733Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence6637

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsMOST by 12TA&M by 68

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). TA&M wins about 96% of the time at a number like ours.

MOST

Games4
Plays per game61.8
Drives per game10.5
SP+-17.6 (125th, offence 118th, defence 128th)
Returning production31% (pass 5%, rush -3%, receiving 47%)

TA&M

Games4
Plays per game74.5
Drives per game12.2
SP+8.9 (39th, offence 38th, defence 44th)
Returning production73% (pass 97%, rush 68%, receiving 61%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceMOSTTA&M
pass rate, all downs47%83rd51%49th
pass rate, standard downs37%108th42%60th
pass rate, 1st down41%89th38%104th
no-huddle share80%45th88%25th
pass rate, passing downs68%48th71%34th
pass rate, red zone46%34th35%85th
seconds per play (own drives)25.8125th29.266th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

MOST offence

MOST offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.10124794 of 138
success rate0.401247106 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22924767 of 138
rush: points added per play0.023247108 of 138
rush: success rate0.44324778 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.85724798 of 138
pass: points added per play0.22924775 of 138
pass: success rate0.363247120 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.75624724 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.49424766 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.195247136 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.99424787 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16024759 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.71424791 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.36824741 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.166247101 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.113247118 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05324769 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.60024724 of 138

TA&M offence

TA&M offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.043298111 of 138
success rate0.44329867 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.074298131 of 138
rush: points added per play0.09429881 of 138
rush: success rate0.49729828 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.820298110 of 138
pass: points added per play0.022298119 of 138
pass: success rate0.385298107 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.405298112 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.47829886 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.36629834 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.21629857 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16629865 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.85029815 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.36029843 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16129893 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07729846 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.084298130 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.400298116 of 138

MOST defence

MOST defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.227296128 of 138
success rate0.517296138 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.0232967 of 138
rush: points added per play0.10729697 of 138
rush: success rate0.509296135 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.67129611 of 138
pass: points added per play0.382296125 of 138
pass: success rate0.508296132 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.48729654 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.581296138 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.360296124 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.332296125 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.16029631 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.870296127 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.969296110 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14929648 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.08829651 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.06129666 of 138
opponent average starting field position67.40029610 of 138

TA&M defence

TA&M defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.03322668 of 138
success rate0.38522662 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30722698 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.07922632 of 138
rush: success rate0.36622644 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.84122636 of 138
pass: points added per play0.21822692 of 138
pass: success rate0.40822677 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.851226130 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.42622651 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.28122670 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.76422659 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.17922645 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.71422669 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.05322654 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.17722687 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.115226100 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.06222671 of 138
opponent average starting field position70.90022645 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs