The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| TA&M pass rush | 3.1% 97104th | 8.8% 21671st | faces MOST | 8.1% 87110th | 5.6% ~1.8 sacks |
| MOST pass rush | 2.9% 102107th | 6.1% 228122nd | faces TA&M | 5.5% 14579th | 4.2% ~1.4 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
MOST with the ball
| MOST offence vs TA&M defence | MOST offence | TA&M defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.10194th | 0.03368th | -26 |
| success rate | 0.401106th | 0.38562nd | -44 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.22967th | 1.30798th | +31 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.023108th | -0.07932nd | -76 |
| rush: success rate | 0.44378th | 0.36644th | -34 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.85798th | 0.84136th | -62 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.22975th | 0.21892nd | +17 |
| pass: success rate | 0.363120th | 0.40877th | -43 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.75624th | 1.851130th | +106 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.49466th | 0.42651st | -15 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.195136th | 0.28170th | -66 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.99487th | 2.76459th | -28 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16059th | 0.17945th | -14 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.71491st | 0.71469th | -22 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.36841st | 3.05354th | +13 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.166101st | 0.17787th | -14 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.113118th | 0.115100th | -18 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.05369th | 0.06271st | +2 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 73.60024th | — | — |
TA&M with the ball
| TA&M offence vs MOST defence | TA&M offence | MOST defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.043111th | 0.227128th | +17 |
| success rate | 0.44367th | 0.517138th | +71 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.074131st | 1.0237th | -124 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.09481st | 0.10797th | +16 |
| rush: success rate | 0.49728th | 0.509135th | +107 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.820110th | 0.67111th | -99 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.022119th | 0.382125th | +6 |
| pass: success rate | 0.385107th | 0.508132nd | +25 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.405112th | 1.48754th | -58 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.47886th | 0.581138th | +52 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.36634th | 0.360124th | +90 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.21657th | 3.332125th | +68 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.16665th | 0.16031st | -34 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.85015th | 0.870127th | +112 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 4.36043rd | 3.969110th | +67 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.16193rd | 0.14948th | -45 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.07746th | 0.08851st | +5 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.084130th | 0.06166th | -64 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 67.400116th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.