Marshall · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-28 · time TBA · Malone Stadium
UL Monroe · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

MRSHULMbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence286Offence: points per play — defence12Offence: success rate — offence3326Offence: success rate — defence61Offence: explosiveness — offence4514Offence: explosiveness — defence2453Run game — offence636Run game — defence281Pass game — offence693Pass game — defence015Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence3834Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence126Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence2420Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence9295

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsMRSH by 52ULM by 28

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). MRSH wins about 77% of the time at a number like ours.

MRSH

Games4
Plays per game67.0
Drives per game11.8
SP+-12.5 (115th, offence 82nd, defence 134th)
Returning production99% (pass 100%, rush 210%, receiving 91%)

ULM

Games4
Plays per game67.8
Drives per game12.2
SP+-29.0 (138th, offence 131st, defence 138th)
Returning production39% (pass 78%, rush 16%, receiving 26%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceMRSHULM
pass rate, all downs48%69th50%56th
pass rate, standard downs38%100th40%85th
pass rate, 1st down35%113th38%102nd
no-huddle share85%32nd95%14th
pass rate, passing downs69%40th75%16th
pass rate, red zone43%45th44%43rd
seconds per play (own drives)29.560th27.985th

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

MRSH offence

MRSH offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.08826899 of 138
success rate0.41826893 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21226876 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.086268130 of 138
rush: success rate0.41726894 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.851268101 of 138
pass: points added per play0.36526843 of 138
pass: success rate0.42526881 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.64726848 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.50026861 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.244268117 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.00226886 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.216268119 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.68426899 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.552268128 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.168268105 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.119268124 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04926860 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.30026827 of 138

ULM offence

ULM offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.052271130 of 138
success rate0.402271103 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.119271119 of 138
rush: points added per play0.07027188 of 138
rush: success rate0.43227186 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.87927190 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.082271134 of 138
pass: success rate0.386271106 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.406271111 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.455271105 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.275271102 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.96827191 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15227152 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.571271125 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.478271131 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.170271110 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10027197 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070271112 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.90027133 of 138

MRSH defence

MRSH defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.332269137 of 138
success rate0.472269130 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.322269105 of 138
rush: points added per play0.11226999 of 138
rush: success rate0.472269123 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.80226929 of 138
pass: points added per play0.533269138 of 138
pass: success rate0.471269120 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.819269123 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.544269135 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.28926981 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.276269122 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.15226927 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.812269110 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.174269118 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11926912 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.06726910 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05226943 of 138
opponent average starting field position71.70026962 of 138

ULM defence

ULM defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.308295135 of 138
success rate0.508295137 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21529566 of 138
rush: points added per play0.314295136 of 138
rush: success rate0.522295138 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.077295115 of 138
pass: points added per play0.339295118 of 138
pass: success rate0.500295130 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.41329534 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.536295133 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.427295136 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.418295130 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.16129532 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.778295102 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.448295125 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.1152958 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.0642958 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05129542 of 138
opponent average starting field position70.60029541 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs