Marshall · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-28 · time TBA · Malone Stadium
UL Monroe · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ULM pass rush2.9% 103109th6.8% 235112thfaces MRSH2.6% 7817th2.7% ~0.9 sacks
MRSH pass rush1.9% 105125th5.4% 205132ndfaces ULM7.1% 8497th4.5% ~1.5 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MRSH with the ball

MRSH offence vs ULM defenceMRSH offenceULM defencerank gap
points added per play0.08899th0.308135th+36
success rate0.41893rd0.508137th+44
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21276th1.21566th-10
rush: points added per play-0.086130th0.314136th+6
rush: success rate0.41794th0.522138th+44
rush: explosiveness0.851101st1.077115th+14
pass: points added per play0.36543rd0.339118th+75
pass: success rate0.42581st0.500130th+49
pass: explosiveness1.64748th1.41334th-14
standard downs: success rate0.50061st0.536133rd+72
passing downs: success rate0.244117th0.427136th+19
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.00286th3.418130th+44
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.216119th0.16132nd-87
short-yardage conversion rate0.68499th0.778102nd+3
points per trip inside the 402.552128th4.448125th-3
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.168105th0.1158th-97
havoc allowed by the front seven0.119124th0.0648th-116
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04960th0.05142nd-18
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.30027th——

ULM with the ball

ULM offence vs MRSH defenceULM offenceMRSH defencerank gap
points added per play-0.052130th0.332137th+7
success rate0.402103rd0.472130th+27
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.119119th1.322105th-14
rush: points added per play0.07088th0.11299th+11
rush: success rate0.43286th0.472123rd+37
rush: explosiveness0.87990th0.80229th-61
pass: points added per play-0.082134th0.533138th+4
pass: success rate0.386106th0.471120th+14
pass: explosiveness1.406111th1.819123rd+12
standard downs: success rate0.455105th0.544135th+30
passing downs: success rate0.275102nd0.28981st-21
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.96891st3.276122nd+31
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15252nd0.15227th-25
short-yardage conversion rate0.571125th0.812110th-15
points per trip inside the 402.478131st4.174118th-13
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.170110th0.11912th-98
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10097th0.06710th-87
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070112th0.05243rd-69
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.90033rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.