South Alabama · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-21 · time TBA · M. M. Roberts Stadium
Southern Miss · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
USM pass rush6.4% 9445th7.4% 23098thfaces USA4.1% 9851st5.2% ~1.7 sacks
USA pass rush5.9% 8549th8.0% 17686thfaces USM6.7% 12096th6.3% ~2.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

USA with the ball

USA offence vs USM defenceUSA offenceUSM defencerank gap
points added per play0.17463rd0.12394th+31
success rate0.41991st0.40681st-10
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30238th1.27390th+52
rush: points added per play0.17747th0.189125th+78
rush: success rate0.42590th0.453109th+19
rush: explosiveness1.06829th1.039104th+75
pass: points added per play0.20877th0.20988th+11
pass: success rate0.42185th0.36337th-48
pass: explosiveness1.63950th1.731117th+67
standard downs: success rate0.448111th0.42550th-61
passing downs: success rate0.35445th0.363125th+80
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.18262nd3.197114th+52
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12116th0.18050th+34
short-yardage conversion rate0.79244th0.70665th+21
points per trip inside the 404.29648th2.96046th-2
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14677th0.13129th-48
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08872nd0.08749th-23
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05880th0.04429th-51
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.30093rd——

USM with the ball

USM offence vs USA defenceUSM offenceUSA defencerank gap
points added per play0.063103rd0.279132nd+29
success rate0.43083rd0.486134th+51
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.125117th1.460133rd+16
rush: points added per play0.19040th0.349138th+98
rush: success rate0.47050th0.505134th+84
rush: explosiveness0.824109th1.380137th+28
pass: points added per play0.000125th0.21089th-36
pass: success rate0.40893rd0.462113th+20
pass: explosiveness1.440103rd1.56576th-27
standard downs: success rate0.49368th0.532131st+63
passing downs: success rate0.272105th0.367127th+22
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.58213th3.230118th+105
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.0902nd0.17442nd+40
short-yardage conversion rate0.84218th0.60025th+7
points per trip inside the 404.09159th4.077116th+57
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15790th0.17993rd+3
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07032nd0.11599th+67
havoc allowed by the secondary0.087134th0.06481st-53
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.0009th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.