UL Monroe · away
at
USA -14
Saturday 2026-10-03 19:00 · Hancock Whitney Stadium
South Alabama · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The units, side by side

ULMUSAbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence655Offence: points per play — defence24Offence: success rate — offence2634Offence: success rate — defence13Offence: explosiveness — offence1473Offence: explosiveness — defence534Run game — offence3666Run game — defence10Pass game — offence345Pass game — defence1536Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence3455Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence615Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence2045Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence9533

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsmarketULM by 39USA by 41

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). USA wins about 52% of the time at a number like ours.

ULM

Games4
Plays per game67.8
Drives per game12.2
SP+-29.0 (138th, offence 131st, defence 138th)
Returning production39% (pass 78%, rush 16%, receiving 26%)

USA

Games4
Plays per game77.0
Drives per game11.2
SP+-15.4 (121st, offence 88th, defence 136th)
Returning production79% (pass 95%, rush 62%, receiving 80%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceULMUSA
pass rate, all downs50%56th42%112th
pass rate, standard downs40%85th37%111th
no-huddle share95%14th92%18th
pass rate, 1st down38%102nd40%95th
pass rate, passing downs75%16th54%116th
pass rate, red zone44%43rd29%115th
seconds per play (own drives)27.985th29.561st

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

ULM offence

ULM offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.052271130 of 138
success rate0.402271103 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.119271119 of 138
rush: points added per play0.07027188 of 138
rush: success rate0.43227186 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.87927190 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.082271134 of 138
pass: success rate0.386271106 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.406271111 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.455271105 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.275271102 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.96827191 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15227152 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.571271125 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.478271131 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.170271110 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10027197 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070271112 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.90027133 of 138

USA offence

USA offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.17430863 of 138
success rate0.41930891 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30230838 of 138
rush: points added per play0.17730847 of 138
rush: success rate0.42530890 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.06830829 of 138
pass: points added per play0.20830877 of 138
pass: success rate0.42130885 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.63930850 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.448308111 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.35430845 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.18230862 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12130816 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.79230844 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.29630848 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14630877 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08830872 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05830880 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.30030893 of 138

ULM defence

ULM defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.308295135 of 138
success rate0.508295137 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21529566 of 138
rush: points added per play0.314295136 of 138
rush: success rate0.522295138 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.077295115 of 138
pass: points added per play0.339295118 of 138
pass: success rate0.500295130 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.41329534 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.536295133 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.427295136 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.418295130 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.16129532 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.778295102 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.448295125 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.1152958 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.0642958 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05129542 of 138
opponent average starting field position70.60029541 of 138

USA defence

USA defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.279218132 of 138
success rate0.486218134 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.460218133 of 138
rush: points added per play0.349218138 of 138
rush: success rate0.505218134 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.380218137 of 138
pass: points added per play0.21021889 of 138
pass: success rate0.462218113 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.56521876 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.532218131 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.367218127 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.230218118 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.17421842 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.60021825 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.077218116 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.17921893 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.11521899 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.06421881 of 138
opponent average starting field position68.30021820 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs