UL Monroe · away
at
USA -14
Saturday 2026-10-03 19:00 · Hancock Whitney Stadium
South Alabama · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
USA pass rush5.9% 8549th8.0% 17686thfaces ULM7.1% 8497th6.5% ~2.1 sacks
ULM pass rush2.9% 103109th6.8% 235112thfaces USA4.1% 9851st3.5% ~1.2 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ULM with the ball

ULM offence vs USA defenceULM offenceUSA defencerank gap
points added per play-0.052130th0.279132nd+2
success rate0.402103rd0.486134th+31
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.119119th1.460133rd+14
rush: points added per play0.07088th0.349138th+50
rush: success rate0.43286th0.505134th+48
rush: explosiveness0.87990th1.380137th+47
pass: points added per play-0.082134th0.21089th-45
pass: success rate0.386106th0.462113th+7
pass: explosiveness1.406111th1.56576th-35
standard downs: success rate0.455105th0.532131st+26
passing downs: success rate0.275102nd0.367127th+25
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.96891st3.230118th+27
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15252nd0.17442nd-10
short-yardage conversion rate0.571125th0.60025th-100
points per trip inside the 402.478131st4.077116th-15
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.170110th0.17993rd-17
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10097th0.11599th+2
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070112th0.06481st-31
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.90033rd——

USA with the ball

USA offence vs ULM defenceUSA offenceULM defencerank gap
points added per play0.17463rd0.308135th+72
success rate0.41991st0.508137th+46
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30238th1.21566th+28
rush: points added per play0.17747th0.314136th+89
rush: success rate0.42590th0.522138th+48
rush: explosiveness1.06829th1.077115th+86
pass: points added per play0.20877th0.339118th+41
pass: success rate0.42185th0.500130th+45
pass: explosiveness1.63950th1.41334th-16
standard downs: success rate0.448111th0.536133rd+22
passing downs: success rate0.35445th0.427136th+91
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.18262nd3.418130th+68
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12116th0.16132nd+16
short-yardage conversion rate0.79244th0.778102nd+58
points per trip inside the 404.29648th4.448125th+77
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14677th0.1158th-69
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08872nd0.0648th-64
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05880th0.05142nd-38
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.30093rd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.