Middle Tennessee · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 15:30 · Williams Stadium (VA)
Liberty · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
LIB pass rush7.6% 7928th10.1% 16939thfaces MTSU4.6% 10961st6.1% ~2.0 sacks
MTSU pass rush1.3% 75130th6.1% 181123rdfaces LIB5.5% 7376th3.4% ~1.1 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MTSU with the ball

MTSU offence vs LIB defenceMTSU offenceLIB defencerank gap
points added per play0.19861st0.03971st+10
success rate0.42586th0.35537th-49
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17198th1.386123rd+25
rush: points added per play0.16550th0.147114th+64
rush: success rate0.44870th0.39866th-4
rush: explosiveness0.88089th1.084117th+28
pass: points added per play0.23972nd0.03941st-31
pass: success rate0.41588th0.32216th-72
pass: explosiveness1.433104th1.804122nd+18
standard downs: success rate0.49465th0.39625th-40
passing downs: success rate0.27899th0.28677th-22
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.49721st3.01997th+76
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13331st0.21189th+58
short-yardage conversion rate0.73379th0.72776th-3
points per trip inside the 404.18256th2.85739th-17
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11327th0.188110th+83
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05315th0.11090th+75
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06189th0.078110th+21
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.70035th——

LIB with the ball

LIB offence vs MTSU defenceLIB offenceMTSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.12482nd0.10187th+5
success rate0.46250th0.452119th+69
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.131115th1.12030th-85
rush: points added per play0.001113th0.05078th-35
rush: success rate0.47542nd0.463118th+76
rush: explosiveness0.689133rd1.00894th-39
pass: points added per play0.38136th0.18683rd+47
pass: success rate0.44962nd0.454109th+47
pass: explosiveness1.9218th1.30013th+5
standard downs: success rate0.48775th0.511121st+46
passing downs: success rate0.40017th0.27967th+50
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.32436th3.093108th+72
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.11310th0.17643rd+33
short-yardage conversion rate0.76261st0.72473rd+12
points per trip inside the 403.64384th2.66727th-57
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14778th0.11710th-68
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09484th0.07119th-65
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05368th0.04632nd-36
average starting field position (yards from own goal)67.200118th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.