Middle Tennessee · away
at
Final MTSU 26 – 28 MRSH
Saturday 2026-09-12 19:00 · Joan C. Edwards Stadium
Marshall · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
MRSH pass rush1.9% 105125th5.4% 205132ndfaces MTSU4.6% 10961st3.2% ~1.1 sacks
MTSU pass rush1.3% 75130th6.1% 181123rdfaces MRSH2.6% 7817th1.9% ~0.6 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MTSU with the ball

MTSU offence vs MRSH defenceMTSU offenceMRSH defencerank gap
points added per play0.19861st0.332137th+76
success rate0.42586th0.472130th+44
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.17198th1.322105th+7
rush: points added per play0.16550th0.11299th+49
rush: success rate0.44870th0.472123rd+53
rush: explosiveness0.88089th0.80229th-60
pass: points added per play0.23972nd0.533138th+66
pass: success rate0.41588th0.471120th+32
pass: explosiveness1.433104th1.819123rd+19
standard downs: success rate0.49465th0.544135th+70
passing downs: success rate0.27899th0.28981st-18
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.49721st3.276122nd+101
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13331st0.15227th-4
short-yardage conversion rate0.73379th0.812110th+31
points per trip inside the 404.18256th4.174118th+62
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11327th0.11912th-15
havoc allowed by the front seven0.05315th0.06710th-5
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06189th0.05243rd-46
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.70035th——

MRSH with the ball

MRSH offence vs MTSU defenceMRSH offenceMTSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.08899th0.10187th-12
success rate0.41893rd0.452119th+26
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21276th1.12030th-46
rush: points added per play-0.086130th0.05078th-52
rush: success rate0.41794th0.463118th+24
rush: explosiveness0.851101st1.00894th-7
pass: points added per play0.36543rd0.18683rd+40
pass: success rate0.42581st0.454109th+28
pass: explosiveness1.64748th1.30013th-35
standard downs: success rate0.50061st0.511121st+60
passing downs: success rate0.244117th0.27967th-50
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.00286th3.093108th+22
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.216119th0.17643rd-76
short-yardage conversion rate0.68499th0.72473rd-26
points per trip inside the 402.552128th2.66727th-101
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.168105th0.11710th-95
havoc allowed by the front seven0.119124th0.07119th-105
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04960th0.04632nd-28
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.30027th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.