James Madison · away
at
Final JMU 46 – 20 ODU
Saturday 2026-09-26 18:00 · S.B. Ballard Stadium
Old Dominion · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The units, side by side

JMUODUbar = FBS percentile, longer is better · dotted tick = median teamOffence: points per play — offence822Offence: points per play — defence10069Offence: success rate — offence700Offence: success rate — defence10085Offence: explosiveness — offence5097Offence: explosiveness — defence1343Run game — offence829Run game — defence8782Pass game — offence721Pass game — defence9456Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — offence610Line yards (O-line vs D-line) — defence8583Havoc (allowed vs created) — offence880Havoc (allowed vs created) — defence3645

Percentile among the 138 FBS teams on each measure this season, offence and defence, both teams. Raw values, plays behind them and ranks are in the tables below.

What actually happens around a number like this

tiecardsJMU by 53ODU by 27

Each bar is how often a college game lands on that margin, from 7,877 FBS games 2015–2025, centred on our card line. The spread misses by 12.3 points on average (37% within a touchdown). JMU wins about 80% of the time at a number like ours.

JMU

Games4
Plays per game67.2
Drives per game12.2
SP+9.9 (36th, offence 48th, defence 27th)
Returning production8% (pass 9%, rush 7%, receiving 9%)

ODU

Games4
Plays per game59.8
Drives per game13.0
SP+-7.9 (101st, offence 117th, defence 73rd)
Returning production9% (pass -2%, rush 10%, receiving 18%)

What each side chooses to do

OffenceJMUODU
pass rate, all downs46%89th47%75th
pass rate, standard downs41%76th39%92nd
pass rate, 1st down46%46th42%72nd
no-huddle share90%22nd86%30th
pass rate, passing downs59%95th60%88th
pass rate, red zone33%92nd30%110th
seconds per play (own drives)27.790th28.973rd

choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.

JMU offence

JMU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play0.29326926 of 138
success rate0.47626942 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22326970 of 138
rush: points added per play0.24526926 of 138
rush: success rate0.49726927 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.00526955 of 138
pass: points added per play0.36826940 of 138
pass: success rate0.45826957 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.52726975 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.52526942 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.33826954 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.23126954 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15426954 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.77326954 of 138
points per trip inside the 404.56226936 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10426917 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06726924 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03726922 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.900269124 of 138

ODU offence

ODU offencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.100239135 of 138
success rate0.310239138 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.4832395 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.076239126 of 138
rush: success rate0.331239136 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.2982394 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.137239136 of 138
pass: success rate0.290239136 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.67723937 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.299239138 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.32623963 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)1.613239138 of 138
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.315239138 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.300239137 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.913239124 of 138
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.243239138 of 138
havoc allowed by the front seven0.205239138 of 138
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03823925 of 138
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.10023961 of 138

JMU defence

JMU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.1972871 of 138
success rate0.2752871 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.380287120 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.14228719 of 138
rush: success rate0.2612872 of 138
rush: explosiveness1.061287108 of 138
pass: points added per play-0.1302879 of 138
pass: success rate0.2812873 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.687287108 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.3112871 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.23028730 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.36928722 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.19628773 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.818287112 of 138
points per trip inside the 402.47828718 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.17828789 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.118287106 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.05928763 of 138
opponent average starting field position72.60028782 of 138

ODU defence

ODU defencevalueplaysFBS rank
points added per play-0.01729844 of 138
success rate0.33929821 of 138
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.24229879 of 138
rush: points added per play-0.10629825 of 138
rush: success rate0.31829818 of 138
rush: explosiveness0.96329885 of 138
pass: points added per play0.10229861 of 138
pass: success rate0.36129833 of 138
pass: explosiveness1.57829881 of 138
standard downs: success rate0.36829813 of 138
passing downs: success rate0.28629878 of 138
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.38929824 of 138
rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line0.223298104 of 138
short-yardage conversion rate0.61929830 of 138
points per trip inside the 403.33329866 of 138
havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16429876 of 138
havoc created by the front seven0.128298116 of 138
havoc created by the secondary0.03729811 of 138
opponent average starting field position66.0002984 of 138

points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs