James Madison · away
at
Final JMU 46 – 20 ODU
Saturday 2026-09-26 18:00 · S.B. Ballard Stadium
Old Dominion · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ODU pass rush5.4% 11262nd10.9% 22926thfaces JMU4.3% 9257th4.9% ~1.6 sacks
JMU pass rush11.5% 1137th10.6% 20833rdfaces ODU14.3% 91135th12.9% ~4.3 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

JMU with the ball

JMU offence vs ODU defenceJMU offenceODU defencerank gap
points added per play0.29326th-0.01744th+18
success rate0.47642nd0.33921st-21
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.22370th1.24279th+9
rush: points added per play0.24526th-0.10625th-1
rush: success rate0.49727th0.31818th-9
rush: explosiveness1.00555th0.96385th+30
pass: points added per play0.36840th0.10261st+21
pass: success rate0.45857th0.36133rd-24
pass: explosiveness1.52775th1.57881st+6
standard downs: success rate0.52542nd0.36813th-29
passing downs: success rate0.33854th0.28678th+24
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.23154th2.38924th-30
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15454th0.223104th+50
short-yardage conversion rate0.77354th0.61930th-24
points per trip inside the 404.56236th3.33366th+30
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.10417th0.16476th+59
havoc allowed by the front seven0.06724th0.128116th+92
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03722nd0.03711th-11
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.900124th——

ODU with the ball

ODU offence vs JMU defenceODU offenceJMU defencerank gap
points added per play-0.100135th-0.1971st-134
success rate0.310138th0.2751st-137
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.4835th1.380120th+115
rush: points added per play-0.076126th-0.14219th-107
rush: success rate0.331136th0.2612nd-134
rush: explosiveness1.2984th1.061108th+104
pass: points added per play-0.137136th-0.1309th-127
pass: success rate0.290136th0.2813rd-133
pass: explosiveness1.67737th1.687108th+71
standard downs: success rate0.299138th0.3111st-137
passing downs: success rate0.32663rd0.23030th-33
line yards per rush (the O-line)1.613138th2.36922nd-116
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.315138th0.19673rd-65
short-yardage conversion rate0.300137th0.818112th-25
points per trip inside the 402.913124th2.47818th-106
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.243138th0.17889th-49
havoc allowed by the front seven0.205138th0.118106th-32
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03825th0.05963rd+38
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.10061st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.