The trenches
| Pass rush | sack rate | stopped behind the line | faces | sacks allowed | pairing |
|---|
| UL pass rush | 4.4% 9181st | 9.5% 16952nd | faces CCU | 9.6% 104126th | 7.0% ~2.3 sacks |
| CCU pass rush | 5.9% 6850th | 8.2% 19680th | faces UL | 6.7% 7592nd | 6.3% ~2.1 sacks |
sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.
CCU with the ball
| CCU offence vs UL defence | CCU offence | UL defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.15769th | -0.1663rd | -66 |
| success rate | 0.412100th | 0.39773rd | -27 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.4299th | 0.9845th | -4 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.10277th | -0.3052nd | -75 |
| rush: success rate | 0.44476th | 0.41882nd | +6 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.87891st | 0.5047th | -84 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.24070th | 0.12768th | -2 |
| pass: success rate | 0.383109th | 0.40876th | -33 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.9984th | 1.42935th | +31 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.440118th | 0.44971st | -47 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.36535th | 0.28069th | +34 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.41427th | 2.65153rd | +26 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.17784th | 0.245118th | +34 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.69295th | 0.4626th | -89 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.58390th | 4.455126th | +36 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.195130th | 0.18296th | -34 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.126128th | 0.116102nd | -26 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.069108th | 0.06686th | -22 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 71.10059th | — | — |
UL with the ball
| UL offence vs CCU defence | UL offence | CCU defence | rank gap |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.13278th | 0.09583rd | +5 |
| success rate | 0.42585th | 0.451117th | +32 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.17595th | 0.9392nd | -93 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.15455th | -0.00557th | +2 |
| rush: success rate | 0.42192nd | 0.444105th | +13 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.12319th | 0.5548th | -11 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.25668th | 0.446129th | +61 |
| pass: success rate | 0.45158th | 0.489126th | +68 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.257135th | 1.58984th | -51 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.47588th | 0.505115th | +27 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.32662nd | 0.27460th | -2 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 3.05978th | 3.182112th | +34 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.18389th | 0.1238th | -81 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.75066th | 0.810109th | +43 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.79375th | 3.16057th | -18 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.15080th | 0.14846th | -34 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.117122nd | 0.09867th | -55 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.03317th | 0.04937th | +20 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 65.900125th | — | — |
Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.