UL Monroe · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-07 15:00 · Centennial Bank Stadium
Arkansas State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ARST pass rush2.9% 70110th7.2% 193101stfaces ULM7.1% 8497th5.0% ~1.7 sacks
ULM pass rush2.9% 103109th6.8% 235112thfaces ARST6.7% 9095th4.8% ~1.6 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

ULM with the ball

ULM offence vs ARST defenceULM offenceARST defencerank gap
points added per play-0.052130th0.161111th-19
success rate0.402103rd0.453120th+17
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.119119th1.24480th-39
rush: points added per play0.07088th0.02568th-20
rush: success rate0.43286th0.463116th+30
rush: explosiveness0.87990th0.89060th-30
pass: points added per play-0.082134th0.462133rd-1
pass: success rate0.386106th0.455110th+4
pass: explosiveness1.406111th1.804121st+10
standard downs: success rate0.455105th0.500112th+7
passing downs: success rate0.275102nd0.329110th+8
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.96891st3.389126th+35
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.15252nd0.13616th-36
short-yardage conversion rate0.571125th0.76289th-36
points per trip inside the 402.478131st3.47676th-55
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.170110th0.12516th-94
havoc allowed by the front seven0.10097th0.07016th-81
havoc allowed by the secondary0.070112th0.05551st-61
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.90033rd——

ARST with the ball

ARST offence vs ULM defenceARST offenceULM defencerank gap
points added per play0.15272nd0.308135th+63
success rate0.48534th0.508137th+103
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.147109th1.21566th-43
rush: points added per play0.23729th0.314136th+107
rush: success rate0.50422nd0.522138th+116
rush: explosiveness0.96272nd1.077115th+43
pass: points added per play0.124102nd0.339118th+16
pass: success rate0.47248th0.500130th+82
pass: explosiveness1.402113th1.41334th-79
standard downs: success rate0.55523rd0.536133rd+110
passing downs: success rate0.29090th0.427136th+46
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.37130th3.418130th+100
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14642nd0.16132nd-10
short-yardage conversion rate0.73974th0.778102nd+28
points per trip inside the 403.43596th4.448125th+29
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14067th0.1158th-59
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07236th0.0648th-28
havoc allowed by the secondary0.068106th0.05142nd-64
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.70085th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.