The units, side by side
What actually happens around a number like this
Needs the card line and the college margin distribution.
null
| Games | — |
| Plays per game | — |
| Drives per game | — |
| SP+ | — (, offence , defence ) |
| Returning production | — (pass —, rush —, receiving —) |
APP
| Games | 4 |
| Plays per game | 72.0 |
| Drives per game | 12.0 |
| SP+ | -4.4 (89th, offence 80th, defence 95th) |
| Returning production | 38% (pass -31%, rush 85%, receiving 57%) |
What each side chooses to do
| Offence | | APP |
|---|
| pass rate, all downs | — | 52%38th |
| pass rate, standard downs | — | 47%31st |
| pass rate, 1st down | — | 47%41st |
| no-huddle share | — | 56%78th |
| pass rate, passing downs | — | 64%66th |
| pass rate, red zone | — | 30%111th |
| seconds per play (own drives) | — | 27.0102nd |
choices, from CFBD play-by-play; a choice repeats within a season, a result mostly does not Rank 1 = highest rate / fastest among FBS.
null offence
| offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
APP offence
| APP offence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.238 | 288 | 44 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.455 | 288 | 55 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.312 | 288 | 34 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.048 | 288 | 93 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.388 | 288 | 112 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 1.076 | 288 | 26 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.475 | 288 | 19 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.524 | 288 | 17 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.464 | 288 | 93 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.459 | 288 | 100 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.447 | 288 | 5 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.577 | 288 | 128 of 138 |
| rushes stopped at or behind the line | 0.239 | 288 | 129 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.667 | 288 | 101 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.694 | 288 | 81 of 138 |
| havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.122 | 288 | 38 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the front seven | 0.080 | 288 | 51 of 138 |
| havoc allowed by the secondary | 0.042 | 288 | 38 of 138 |
| average starting field position (yards from own goal) | 69.900 | 288 | 81 of 138 |
null defence
| defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
APP defence
| APP defence | value | plays | FBS rank |
|---|
| points added per play | 0.080 | 272 | 78 of 138 |
| success rate | 0.423 | 272 | 92 of 138 |
| explosiveness (points added on successful plays) | 1.132 | 272 | 34 of 138 |
| rush: points added per play | 0.051 | 272 | 79 of 138 |
| rush: success rate | 0.430 | 272 | 91 of 138 |
| rush: explosiveness | 0.843 | 272 | 38 of 138 |
| pass: points added per play | 0.132 | 272 | 72 of 138 |
| pass: success rate | 0.416 | 272 | 84 of 138 |
| pass: explosiveness | 1.397 | 272 | 31 of 138 |
| standard downs: success rate | 0.510 | 272 | 118 of 138 |
| passing downs: success rate | 0.212 | 272 | 17 of 138 |
| line yards per rush (the O-line) | 2.620 | 272 | 45 of 138 |
| rushes stopped (by this defence) at or behind the line | 0.227 | 272 | 107 of 138 |
| short-yardage conversion rate | 0.842 | 272 | 119 of 138 |
| points per trip inside the 40 | 3.727 | 272 | 95 of 138 |
| havoc created (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play) | 0.176 | 272 | 84 of 138 |
| havoc created by the front seven | 0.107 | 272 | 83 of 138 |
| havoc created by the secondary | 0.070 | 272 | 95 of 138 |
| opponent average starting field position | 73.600 | 272 | 100 of 138 |
points added per play: CFBD predicted points added (their EPA); positive helps the offence · success rate: share of plays that gain 50% of needed yards on 1st, 70% on 2nd, 100% on 3rd/4th · explosiveness: average points added on the plays that succeeded - big-play size · havoc: tackles for loss, forced fumbles, interceptions and breakups as a share of plays · rank: 1 = best among FBS teams in the direction that helps that side · fei: bcftoys.com FEI: opponent-adjusted possession efficiency, offence/defence/special teams, with FBS rank - theirs · fplus: bcftoys.com F+: FEI and SP+ combined, in standard deviations above average - theirs