Massachusetts · away
at
—
Wednesday 2026-11-11 · time TBA · Glass Bowl
Toledo · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TOL pass rush7.1% 9937th6.9% 218110thfaces MASS5.0% 4066th6.0% ~2.0 sacks
MASS pass rush9.1% 8818th7.3% 13699thfaces TOL2.1% 9612th5.6% ~1.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

MASS with the ball

MASS offence vs TOL defenceMASS offenceTOL defencerank gap
points added per play0.28030th-0.02339th+9
success rate0.45059th0.32515th-44
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.23765th1.30295th+30
rush: points added per play0.26718th-0.09529th+11
rush: success rate0.48139th0.2839th-30
rush: explosiveness1.02247th0.95882nd+35
pass: points added per play0.36244th0.17079th+35
pass: success rate0.40794th0.39169th-25
pass: explosiveness1.67139th1.58082nd+43
standard downs: success rate0.51050th0.38619th-31
passing downs: success rate0.30281st0.21016th-65
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.52018th2.62146th+28
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14140th0.20785th+45
short-yardage conversion rate0.550128th0.3893rd-125
points per trip inside the 403.88972nd2.87541st-31
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.09512th0.13531st+19
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07339th0.07324th-15
havoc allowed by the secondary0.0236th0.06272nd+66
average starting field position (yards from own goal)65.000131st——

TOL with the ball

TOL offence vs MASS defenceTOL offenceMASS defencerank gap
points added per play0.26934th-0.13911th-23
success rate0.44762nd0.36645th-17
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.5271st1.0206th+5
rush: points added per play0.10675th-0.2774th-71
rush: success rate0.41596th0.35335th-61
rush: explosiveness1.06730th0.3161st-29
pass: points added per play0.44024th0.04644th+20
pass: success rate0.48440th0.38965th+25
pass: explosiveness1.9357th1.53163rd+56
standard downs: success rate0.49763rd0.42147th-16
passing downs: success rate0.32959th0.26353rd-6
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07774th2.56738th-36
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17075th0.218101st+26
short-yardage conversion rate0.667106th0.70664th-42
points per trip inside the 404.55237th1.5001st-36
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13662nd0.16169th+7
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07238th0.08850th+12
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06497th0.073100th+3
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.300106th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.