Sacramento State · away
at
—
Wednesday 2026-11-11 · time TBA · Kelly/Shorts Stadium
Central Michigan · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
CMU pass rush4.3% 9385th5.7% 193130thfaces SAC3.6% 16640th4.0% ~1.3 sacks
SAC pass rush1.8% 111127th7.9% 24188thfaces CMU9.3% 54122nd5.5% ~1.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

SAC with the ball

SAC offence vs CMU defenceSAC offenceCMU defencerank gap
points added per play-0.061131st0.166114th-17
success rate0.41895th0.473132nd+37
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.005136th1.11829th-107
rush: points added per play-0.089131st0.118104th-27
rush: success rate0.47641st0.496133rd+92
rush: explosiveness0.705131st0.86243rd-88
pass: points added per play0.002123rd0.15375th-48
pass: success rate0.387103rd0.434102nd-1
pass: explosiveness1.274132nd1.32917th-115
standard downs: success rate0.49664th0.522126th+62
passing downs: success rate0.228126th0.366126th0
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.691121st3.534137th+16
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.252135th0.13514th-121
short-yardage conversion rate0.75070th0.933136th+66
points per trip inside the 402.552129th3.39370th-59
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.169108th0.14442nd-66
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08358th0.06814th-44
havoc allowed by the secondary0.086132nd0.076107th-25
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.10062nd——

CMU with the ball

CMU offence vs SAC defenceCMU offenceSAC defencerank gap
points added per play0.000123rd0.12597th-26
success rate0.351129th0.36040th-89
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.19687th1.417128th+41
rush: points added per play0.13568th-0.03743rd-25
rush: success rate0.401102nd0.32322nd-80
rush: explosiveness1.10722nd1.113121st+99
pass: points added per play-0.180137th0.341119th-18
pass: success rate0.263138th0.41482nd-56
pass: explosiveness1.423107th1.674105th-2
standard downs: success rate0.395131st0.43658th-73
passing downs: success rate0.254112th0.20814th-98
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.18163rd2.91283rd+20
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12922nd0.18049th+27
short-yardage conversion rate0.82625th0.5009th-16
points per trip inside the 403.000119th3.821100th-19
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.16294th0.12215th-79
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09687th0.08953rd-34
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06699th0.0337th-92
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.40051st——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.