Western Michigan · away
at
—
Tuesday 2026-11-10 19:00 · InfoCision Stadium
Akron · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
AKR pass rush0.0% 95138th5.2% 192134thfaces WMU5.4% 7475th2.7% ~0.9 sacks
WMU pass rush3.0% 66105th5.8% 174128thfaces AKR7.6% 105105th5.3% ~1.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WMU with the ball

WMU offence vs AKR defenceWMU offenceAKR defencerank gap
points added per play0.09397th0.241129th+32
success rate0.400108th0.43198th-10
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.16799th1.372115th+16
rush: points added per play0.14763rd0.04576th+13
rush: success rate0.41397th0.436101st+4
rush: explosiveness0.97964th0.87855th-9
pass: points added per play-0.006126th0.494136th+10
pass: success rate0.380111th0.41990th-21
pass: explosiveness1.426106th1.910134th+28
standard downs: success rate0.450108th0.48294th-14
passing downs: success rate0.30675th0.316102nd+27
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.870101st2.89173rd-28
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16767th0.18857th-10
short-yardage conversion rate0.73778th0.68855th-23
points per trip inside the 404.36442nd3.79299th+57
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13149th0.15050th+1
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09486th0.08137th-49
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03723rd0.06991st+68
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60092nd——

AKR with the ball

AKR offence vs WMU defenceAKR offenceWMU defencerank gap
points added per play0.020117th0.09986th-31
success rate0.44366th0.465125th+59
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)0.981137th1.02510th-127
rush: points added per play0.09979th0.02266th-13
rush: success rate0.51319th0.450108th+89
rush: explosiveness0.709129th0.72018th-111
pass: points added per play0.027117th0.17381st-36
pass: success rate0.41092nd0.464115th+23
pass: explosiveness1.262134th1.44042nd-92
standard downs: success rate0.50059th0.47791st+32
passing downs: success rate0.30874th0.432137th+63
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.61912th3.051103rd+91
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13023rd0.17241st+18
short-yardage conversion rate0.81827th0.72070th+43
points per trip inside the 403.95069th3.65089th+20
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.198131st0.1084th-127
havoc allowed by the front seven0.122126th0.0563rd-123
havoc allowed by the secondary0.076119th0.05245th-74
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.4004th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.