Toledo · away
at
—
Wednesday 2026-11-04 · time TBA · Hornet Stadium
Sacramento State · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
SAC pass rush1.8% 111127th7.9% 24188thfaces TOL2.1% 9612th1.9% ~0.6 sacks
TOL pass rush7.1% 9937th6.9% 218110thfaces SAC3.6% 16640th5.3% ~1.8 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

TOL with the ball

TOL offence vs SAC defenceTOL offenceSAC defencerank gap
points added per play0.26934th0.12597th+63
success rate0.44762nd0.36040th-22
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.5271st1.417128th+127
rush: points added per play0.10675th-0.03743rd-32
rush: success rate0.41596th0.32322nd-74
rush: explosiveness1.06730th1.113121st+91
pass: points added per play0.44024th0.341119th+95
pass: success rate0.48440th0.41482nd+42
pass: explosiveness1.9357th1.674105th+98
standard downs: success rate0.49763rd0.43658th-5
passing downs: success rate0.32959th0.20814th-45
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.07774th2.91283rd+9
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.17075th0.18049th-26
short-yardage conversion rate0.667106th0.5009th-97
points per trip inside the 404.55237th3.821100th+63
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13662nd0.12215th-47
havoc allowed by the front seven0.07238th0.08953rd+15
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06497th0.0337th-90
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.300106th——

SAC with the ball

SAC offence vs TOL defenceSAC offenceTOL defencerank gap
points added per play-0.061131st-0.02339th-92
success rate0.41895th0.32515th-80
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.005136th1.30295th-41
rush: points added per play-0.089131st-0.09529th-102
rush: success rate0.47641st0.2839th-32
rush: explosiveness0.705131st0.95882nd-49
pass: points added per play0.002123rd0.17079th-44
pass: success rate0.387103rd0.39169th-34
pass: explosiveness1.274132nd1.58082nd-50
standard downs: success rate0.49664th0.38619th-45
passing downs: success rate0.228126th0.21016th-110
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.691121st2.62146th-75
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.252135th0.20785th-50
short-yardage conversion rate0.75070th0.3893rd-67
points per trip inside the 402.552129th2.87541st-88
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.169108th0.13531st-77
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08358th0.07324th-34
havoc allowed by the secondary0.086132nd0.06272nd-60
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.10062nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.