Bowling Green · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-10-31 12:00 · Waldo Stadium
Western Michigan · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
WMU pass rush3.0% 66105th5.8% 174128thfaces BGSU4.3% 7056th3.7% ~1.2 sacks
BGSU pass rush9.2% 6517th10.7% 17831stfaces WMU5.4% 7475th7.3% ~2.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

BGSU with the ball

BGSU offence vs WMU defenceBGSU offenceWMU defencerank gap
points added per play-0.115136th0.09986th-50
success rate0.336135th0.465125th-10
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)0.958138th1.02510th-128
rush: points added per play-0.261138th0.02266th-72
rush: success rate0.302138th0.450108th-30
rush: explosiveness0.577136th0.72018th-118
pass: points added per play0.059111th0.17381st-30
pass: success rate0.364119th0.464115th-4
pass: explosiveness1.447101st1.44042nd-59
standard downs: success rate0.431124th0.47791st-33
passing downs: success rate0.152137th0.432137th0
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.431135th3.051103rd-32
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.246133rd0.17241st-92
short-yardage conversion rate0.72780th0.72070th-10
points per trip inside the 401.188138th3.65089th-49
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.194129th0.1084th-125
havoc allowed by the front seven0.138135th0.0563rd-132
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05676th0.05245th-31
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.30053rd——

WMU with the ball

WMU offence vs BGSU defenceWMU offenceBGSU defencerank gap
points added per play0.09397th0.227127th+30
success rate0.400108th0.492135th+27
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.16799th1.29493rd-6
rush: points added per play0.14763rd0.251132nd+69
rush: success rate0.41397th0.520137th+40
rush: explosiveness0.97964th1.216133rd+69
pass: points added per play-0.006126th0.277106th-20
pass: success rate0.380111th0.477122nd+11
pass: explosiveness1.426106th1.43839th-67
standard downs: success rate0.450108th0.556136th+28
passing downs: success rate0.30675th0.30694th+19
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.870101st3.436133rd+32
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16767th0.16936th-31
short-yardage conversion rate0.73778th0.73981st+3
points per trip inside the 404.36442nd4.231121st+79
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.13149th0.12013th-36
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09486th0.09156th-30
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03723rd0.0292nd-21
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.60092nd——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.