Sacramento State · away
at
Final SAC 17 – 28 EMU
Saturday 2026-08-29 18:30 · Rynearson Stadium
Eastern Michigan · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
EMU pass rush2.0% 149123rd7.1% 269106thfaces SAC3.6% 16640th2.8% ~0.9 sacks
SAC pass rush1.8% 111127th7.9% 24188thfaces EMU4.3% 14154th3.0% ~1.0 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

SAC with the ball

SAC offence vs EMU defenceSAC offenceEMU defencerank gap
points added per play-0.061131st0.11290th-41
success rate0.41895th0.41084th-11
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.005136th1.25384th-52
rush: points added per play-0.089131st0.06482nd-49
rush: success rate0.47641st0.40672nd+31
rush: explosiveness0.705131st1.040105th-26
pass: points added per play0.002123rd0.20487th-36
pass: success rate0.387103rd0.42696th-7
pass: explosiveness1.274132nd1.45550th-82
standard downs: success rate0.49664th0.48496th+32
passing downs: success rate0.228126th0.26555th-71
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.691121st2.97092nd-29
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.252135th0.18755th-80
short-yardage conversion rate0.75070th0.69657th-13
points per trip inside the 402.552129th3.40672nd-57
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.169108th0.17991st-17
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08358th0.09561st+3
havoc allowed by the secondary0.086132nd0.084122nd-10
average starting field position (yards from own goal)71.10062nd——

EMU with the ball

EMU offence vs SAC defenceEMU offenceSAC defencerank gap
points added per play-0.016124th0.12597th-27
success rate0.371122nd0.36040th-82
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.143110th1.417128th+18
rush: points added per play0.036102nd-0.03743rd-59
rush: success rate0.394109th0.32322nd-87
rush: explosiveness0.95674th1.113121st+47
pass: points added per play0.058112th0.341119th+7
pass: success rate0.362121st0.41482nd-39
pass: explosiveness1.310126th1.674105th-21
standard downs: success rate0.436121st0.43658th-63
passing downs: success rate0.236123rd0.20814th-109
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.89598th2.91283rd-15
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.16868th0.18049th-19
short-yardage conversion rate0.80037th0.5009th-28
points per trip inside the 403.179114th3.821100th-14
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.172112th0.12215th-97
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09894th0.08953rd-41
havoc allowed by the secondary0.074116th0.0337th-109
average starting field position (yards from own goal)74.80010th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.