South Alabama · away
at
Final USA 24 – 28 TULN
Saturday 2026-09-12 19:00 · Yulman Stadium
Tulane · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
TULN pass rush4.1% 12289th7.3% 275100thfaces USA4.1% 9851st4.1% ~1.3 sacks
USA pass rush5.9% 8549th8.0% 17686thfaces TULN8.6% 116118th7.2% ~2.4 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

USA with the ball

USA offence vs TULN defenceUSA offenceTULN defencerank gap
points added per play0.17463rd0.171115th+52
success rate0.41991st0.39672nd-19
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.30238th1.30697th+59
rush: points added per play0.17747th0.112101st+54
rush: success rate0.42590th0.37048th-42
rush: explosiveness1.06829th1.074112th+83
pass: points added per play0.20877th0.300110th+33
pass: success rate0.42185th0.443107th+22
pass: explosiveness1.63950th1.54669th+19
standard downs: success rate0.448111th0.44162nd-49
passing downs: success rate0.35445th0.317104th+59
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.18262nd3.086106th+44
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.12116th0.16233rd+17
short-yardage conversion rate0.79244th0.76997th+53
points per trip inside the 404.29648th3.30865th+17
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.14677th0.1106th-71
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08872nd0.06711th-61
havoc allowed by the secondary0.05880th0.04224th-56
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.30093rd——

TULN with the ball

TULN offence vs USA defenceTULN offenceUSA defencerank gap
points added per play0.10392nd0.279132nd+40
success rate0.343131st0.486134th+3
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.5133rd1.460133rd+130
rush: points added per play0.16151st0.349138th+87
rush: success rate0.379118th0.505134th+16
rush: explosiveness1.3461st1.380137th+136
pass: points added per play0.020120th0.21089th-31
pass: success rate0.304134th0.462113th-21
pass: explosiveness1.70334th1.56576th+42
standard downs: success rate0.408128th0.532131st+3
passing downs: success rate0.237122nd0.367127th+5
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.573129th3.230118th-11
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.218120th0.17442nd-78
short-yardage conversion rate0.75072nd0.60025th-47
points per trip inside the 402.474132nd4.077116th-16
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.200133rd0.17993rd-40
havoc allowed by the front seven0.135133rd0.11599th-34
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06598th0.06481st-17
average starting field position (yards from own goal)75.1006th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.