App State · away
at
Final APP 27 – 24 ECU
Saturday 2026-09-12 12:00 · Dowdy-Ficklen Stadium
East Carolina · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBettingResults

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
ECU pass rush3.7% 8193rd12.0% 20919thfaces APP2.7% 11219th3.2% ~1.1 sacks
APP pass rush2.8% 107112th10.6% 20834thfaces ECU7.3% 8299th5.1% ~1.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

APP with the ball

APP offence vs ECU defenceAPP offenceECU defencerank gap
points added per play0.23844th-0.01842nd-2
success rate0.45555th0.35435th-20
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.31234th1.313101st+67
rush: points added per play0.04893rd0.02467th-26
rush: success rate0.388112th0.37047th-65
rush: explosiveness1.07626th1.183131st+105
pass: points added per play0.47519th-0.00231st+12
pass: success rate0.52417th0.34525th+8
pass: explosiveness1.46493rd1.54065th-28
standard downs: success rate0.459100th0.37114th-86
passing downs: success rate0.4475th0.327109th+104
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.577128th2.25211th-117
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.239129th0.291134th+5
short-yardage conversion rate0.667101st0.58320th-81
points per trip inside the 403.69481st2.84637th-44
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.12238th0.194113th+75
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08051st0.160131st+80
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04238th0.0359th-29
average starting field position (yards from own goal)69.90081st——

ECU with the ball

ECU offence vs APP defenceECU offenceAPP defencerank gap
points added per play0.056106th0.08078th-28
success rate0.401105th0.42392nd-13
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.166100th1.13234th-66
rush: points added per play-0.067124th0.05179th-45
rush: success rate0.368121st0.43091st-30
rush: explosiveness0.836105th0.84338th-67
pass: points added per play0.21076th0.13272nd-4
pass: success rate0.42482nd0.41684th+2
pass: explosiveness1.49785th1.39731st-54
standard downs: success rate0.49171st0.510118th+47
passing downs: success rate0.200134th0.21217th-117
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.431136th2.62045th-91
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.19798th0.227107th+9
short-yardage conversion rate0.72781st0.842119th+38
points per trip inside the 403.238110th3.72795th-15
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.182124th0.17684th-40
havoc allowed by the front seven0.116120th0.10783rd-37
havoc allowed by the secondary0.066100th0.07095th-5
average starting field position (yards from own goal)73.40025th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.