Wyoming · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 · time TBA · Sun Bowl
UTEP · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UTEP pass rush1.2% 83133rd6.0% 183124thfaces WYO5.3% 7672nd3.2% ~1.1 sacks
WYO pass rush2.3% 87121st7.1% 198105thfaces UTEP21.1% 71137th11.7% ~3.9 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

WYO with the ball

WYO offence vs UTEP defenceWYO offenceUTEP defencerank gap
points added per play0.15671st0.252130th+59
success rate0.46152nd0.472131st+79
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.088128th1.20963rd-65
rush: points added per play0.14861st0.136112th+51
rush: success rate0.46555th0.439104th+49
rush: explosiveness0.795116th0.92271st-45
pass: points added per play0.16191st0.512137th+46
pass: success rate0.44070th0.528138th+68
pass: explosiveness1.330124th1.57178th-46
standard downs: success rate0.50358th0.508116th+58
passing downs: success rate0.36538th0.369129th+91
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.55615th2.96991st+76
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14039th0.223105th+66
short-yardage conversion rate1.0002nd0.66752nd+50
points per trip inside the 402.958122nd4.500128th+6
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15486th0.12617th-69
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09179th0.09459th-20
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06291st0.0314th-87
average starting field position (yards from own goal)70.10078th——

UTEP with the ball

UTEP offence vs WYO defenceUTEP offenceWYO defencerank gap
points added per play-0.179138th0.12395th-43
success rate0.367124th0.443109th-15
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.092127th1.09123rd-104
rush: points added per play-0.197136th0.133110th-26
rush: success rate0.357128th0.462115th-13
rush: explosiveness0.86795th0.85041st-54
pass: points added per play-0.037131st0.19885th-46
pass: success rate0.40297th0.42595th-2
pass: explosiveness1.371118th1.44748th-70
standard downs: success rate0.442115th0.503114th-1
passing downs: success rate0.200135th0.28880th-55
line yards per rush (the O-line)2.516133rd3.263119th-14
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.240131st0.14521st-110
short-yardage conversion rate0.500135th0.923134th-1
points per trip inside the 401.700136th2.95745th-91
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.217137th0.13026th-111
havoc allowed by the front seven0.173137th0.07633rd-104
havoc allowed by the secondary0.04448th0.05346th-2
average starting field position (yards from own goal)68.800100th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.