UNLV · away
at
—
Saturday 2026-11-14 19:30 · University Stadium (NM)
New Mexico · home
GameNewsMismatchesTeamPersonnelBetting

The trenches

Pass rushsack ratestopped behind the linefacessacks allowedpairing
UNM pass rush5.8% 8651st13.3% 17310thfaces UNLV7.9% 127107th6.8% ~2.3 sacks
UNLV pass rush8.3% 13223rd8.9% 25865thfaces UNM14.1% 71134th11.2% ~3.7 sacks

sacks from CFBD play-by-play; college has no charted pressure, and these rates are not opponent-adjusted Measured on 7,926 team-games 2022–25: a college line's sacks-allowed rate carries +0.27 into its next game and a defence's sack rate only +0.10 — the line is most of this. The pairing predicts the game's sack rate +0.27, yards per dropback −0.16 and points added per play −0.15. Heaviest quarter of pairings against lightest: 7.8% vs 4.2% sack rate, 6.1 vs 7.2 yards per dropback.

UNLV with the ball

UNLV offence vs UNM defenceUNLV offenceUNM defencerank gap
points added per play0.053107th-0.1467th-100
success rate0.384118th0.32113th-105
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.21973rd1.374116th+43
rush: points added per play0.06189th-0.14518th-71
rush: success rate0.397106th0.30713th-93
rush: explosiveness0.90883rd0.92674th-9
pass: points added per play0.13597th0.08658th-39
pass: success rate0.389102nd0.35128th-74
pass: explosiveness1.61053rd1.828126th+73
standard downs: success rate0.456104th0.36812th-92
passing downs: success rate0.227127th0.24736th-91
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.21956th1.9173rd-53
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.13025th0.246119th+94
short-yardage conversion rate0.667108th0.5008th-100
points per trip inside the 402.955123rd2.58321st-102
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.15791st0.249137th+46
havoc allowed by the front seven0.09689th0.169133rd+44
havoc allowed by the secondary0.06083rd0.080116th+33
average starting field position (yards from own goal)72.60040th——

UNM with the ball

UNM offence vs UNLV defenceUNM offenceUNLV defencerank gap
points added per play0.16367th0.07676th+9
success rate0.41796th0.40476th-20
explosiveness (points added on successful plays)1.23566th1.15443rd-23
rush: points added per play0.26419th0.124106th+87
rush: success rate0.46259th0.477127th+68
rush: explosiveness1.12618th0.74723rd+5
pass: points added per play-0.021129th0.11866th-63
pass: success rate0.337129th0.35129th-100
pass: explosiveness1.54271st1.696110th+39
standard downs: success rate0.47390th0.46684th-6
passing downs: success rate0.28794th0.28679th-15
line yards per rush (the O-line)3.28544th3.606138th+94
rushes stopped at or behind the line0.14038th0.13313th-25
short-yardage conversion rate0.8898th0.833117th+109
points per trip inside the 404.27352nd3.47877th+25
havoc allowed (TFL, forced fumbles, breakups per play)0.11734th0.16170th+36
havoc allowed by the front seven0.08769th0.07120th-49
havoc allowed by the secondary0.03014th0.090128th+114
average starting field position (yards from own goal)59.600138th——

Rank gap = the defence's FBS rank minus the offence's on the same measure: +60 means the offence ranks 60 places better than the defence it faces. Unit against unit only — college has no player charting to name a matchup by.